Client Refusal of Safety Evaluation — Client B Coastal Project
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Client_Refusal_of_Safety_Evaluation_—_Client_B_Coastal_Project
Properties
Instance of
ClientAuthorityOverrideofSafetyRecommendationState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientAuthorityOverrideofSafetyRecommendationState
Active period
Activated when Client B refuses Engineer A's recommendation for detailed evaluation; persists unless Client B agrees or Engineer A withdraws
Affected parties
Adjacent property owners
Client B
Engineer A
Future residents
Public
Regulatory agencies
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Subject
Client B's refusal to authorize or agree to the detailed climate and hydraulic evaluation recommended by Engineer A
Terminated by
Client B agreeing to evaluation and disclosure, or Engineer A withdrawing from the project
Triggering event
Client B's refusal to accept that detailed climate evaluation and disclosure of potential impacts is required or appropriate
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
If Client B remains unconvinced, Engineer A should propose to Client B that engineer A provides the potential concern that may necessitate more detailed evaluation in an engineering report for consideration by regulatory agencies and the public
Text references
Failing agreement by Client B to either of these courses of action the BER believes that Engineer A should withdraw from the project
If Client B remains unconvinced, Engineer A should propose to Client B that engineer A provides the potential concern that may necessitate more detailed evaluation in an engineering report for consideration by regulatory agencies and the public
In BER Case 18-9, the Owner refused to agree that such protection was required or appropriate
TTL
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Client_Refusal_of_Safety_Evaluation_—_Client_B_Coastal_Project> a proeth:ClientAuthorityOverrideofSafetyRecommendationState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Client Refusal of Safety Evaluation — Client B Coastal Project" ;
proeth:activeperiod "Activated when Client B refuses Engineer A's recommendation for detailed evaluation; persists unless Client B agrees or Engineer A withdraws" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Adjacent property owners",
"Client B",
"Engineer A",
"Future residents",
"Public",
"Regulatory agencies" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T06:42:52.571341+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T06:42:52.571341+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "If Client B remains unconvinced, Engineer A should propose to Client B that engineer A provides the potential concern that may necessitate more detailed evaluation in an engineering report for consideration by regulatory agencies and the public" ;
proeth:stateclass "Client Authority Override of Safety Recommendation State" ;
proeth:subject "Client B's refusal to authorize or agree to the detailed climate and hydraulic evaluation recommended by Engineer A" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Client B agreeing to evaluation and disclosure, or Engineer A withdrawing from the project" ;
proeth:textreferences "Failing agreement by Client B to either of these courses of action the BER believes that Engineer A should withdraw from the project",
"If Client B remains unconvinced, Engineer A should propose to Client B that engineer A provides the potential concern that may necessitate more detailed evaluation in an engineering report for consideration by regulatory agencies and the public",
"In BER Case 18-9, the Owner refused to agree that such protection was required or appropriate" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Client B's refusal to accept that detailed climate evaluation and disclosure of potential impacts is required or appropriate" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 88 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T10:32:26.872552"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 88 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
88
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T06:42:52.571341+00:00
First case
88
Generated
2026-02-27T06:42:52.571341+00:00
Attributed to
Case 88 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T10:32:26.872552
Generated by
ProEthica Case 88 Extraction