Client B Refusal of Climate Evaluation and Disclosure
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Client_B_Refusal_of_Climate_Evaluation_and_Disclosure
Properties
Instance of
Client-DirectedDeferralofThird-PartyRiskAnalysisState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Client-DirectedDeferralofThird-PartyRiskAnalysisState
Active period
From Client B's refusal of Engineer A's proposed evaluation and disclosure, through either Client B's reversal or Engineer A's withdrawal
Affected parties
Client B
Engineer A
Regulatory agencies
Third-party residential property owners
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Subject
Client B's refusal to authorize detailed climate impact evaluation or disclosure of potential flooding impacts to regulatory agencies and the public
Terminated by
Either Client B's agreement to evaluation or disclosure, or Engineer A's withdrawal from the project
Triggering event
Client B's explicit refusal to agree to detailed evaluation of future climate conditions or disclosure of potential flooding impacts
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A should engage Client B in discussions about the need for the detailed evaluation and disclosure of the potential impacts on the public and alternatives for the project to mitigate those impacts, and the potential risk to Client B of not evaluating the potential impacts
Text references
Engineer A should engage Client B in discussions about the need for the detailed evaluation and disclosure of the potential impacts on the public and alternatives for the project to mitigate those impacts, and the potential risk to Client B of not evaluating the potential impacts
Failing agreement by Client B to either of these courses of action the BER believes that Engineer A should withdraw from the project
If Client B remains unconvinced, Engineer A should propose to Client B that engineer a provides the potential concern that may necessitate more detailed evaluation in an engineering report for consideration by regulatory agencies and the public
TTL
@prefix case88: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case88:Client_B_Refusal_of_Climate_Evaluation_and_Disclosure a proeth:Client-DirectedDeferralofThird-PartyRiskAnalysisState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Client B Refusal of Climate Evaluation and Disclosure" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From Client B's refusal of Engineer A's proposed evaluation and disclosure, through either Client B's reversal or Engineer A's withdrawal" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client B",
"Engineer A",
"Regulatory agencies",
"Third-party residential property owners" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-26T00:10:17.210310+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-26T00:10:17.210310+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A should engage Client B in discussions about the need for the detailed evaluation and disclosure of the potential impacts on the public and alternatives for the project to mitigate those impacts, and the potential risk to Client B of not evaluating the potential impacts" ;
proeth:stateclass "Client-Directed Deferral of Third-Party Risk Analysis State" ;
proeth:subject "Client B's refusal to authorize detailed climate impact evaluation or disclosure of potential flooding impacts to regulatory agencies and the public" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Either Client B's agreement to evaluation or disclosure, or Engineer A's withdrawal from the project" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A should engage Client B in discussions about the need for the detailed evaluation and disclosure of the potential impacts on the public and alternatives for the project to mitigate those impacts, and the potential risk to Client B of not evaluating the potential impacts",
"Failing agreement by Client B to either of these courses of action the BER believes that Engineer A should withdraw from the project",
"If Client B remains unconvinced, Engineer A should propose to Client B that engineer a provides the potential concern that may necessitate more detailed evaluation in an engineering report for consideration by regulatory agencies and the public" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Client B's explicit refusal to agree to detailed evaluation of future climate conditions or disclosure of potential flooding impacts" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 88 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-26T00:31:11.060919"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 88 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
88
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-26T00:10:17.210310+00:00
First case
88
Generated
2026-02-26T00:10:17.210310+00:00
Attributed to
Case 88 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-26T00:31:11.060919
Generated by
ProEthica Case 88 Extraction