Client-Directed Deferral of Third-Party Risk Analysis — Client B Project
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Client-Directed_Deferral_of_Third-Party_Risk_Analysis_—_Client_B_Project
Properties
Instance of
Client-DirectedDeferralofThird-PartyRiskAnalysisState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Client-DirectedDeferralofThird-PartyRiskAnalysisState
Active period
Active from Client B's refusal to authorize detailed evaluation; persists until client reversal or Engineer A's withdrawal
Affected parties
Adjacent property owners
Client B
Engineer A
Future residents
Regulatory agencies
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Subject
Client B's direction to proceed without conducting the detailed climate and hydraulic impact analysis recommended by Engineer A
Terminated by
Client B authorizing the evaluation, or Engineer A withdrawing from the project
Triggering event
Client B's refusal to authorize the detailed, complex evaluation of future climate conditions and their impact on third-party properties
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A should engage Client B in discussions about the need for the detailed evaluation and disclosure of the potential impacts on the public and alternatives for the project to mitigate those impacts, and the potential risk to Client B of not evaluating the potential impacts
Text references
Engineer A should engage Client B in discussions about the need for the detailed evaluation and disclosure of the potential impacts on the public and alternatives for the project to mitigate those impacts, and the potential risk to Client B of not evaluating the potential impacts
If Client B remains unconvinced, Engineer A should propose to Client B that engineer A provides the potential concern that may necessitate more detailed evaluation in an engineering report for consideration by regulatory agencies and the public
TTL
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Client-Directed_Deferral_of_Third-Party_Risk_Analysis_—_Client_B_Project> a proeth:Client-DirectedDeferralofThird-PartyRiskAnalysisState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Client-Directed Deferral of Third-Party Risk Analysis — Client B Project" ;
proeth:activeperiod "Active from Client B's refusal to authorize detailed evaluation; persists until client reversal or Engineer A's withdrawal" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Adjacent property owners",
"Client B",
"Engineer A",
"Future residents",
"Regulatory agencies" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T06:42:52.571341+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T06:42:52.571341+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A should engage Client B in discussions about the need for the detailed evaluation and disclosure of the potential impacts on the public and alternatives for the project to mitigate those impacts, and the potential risk to Client B of not evaluating the potential impacts" ;
proeth:stateclass "Client-Directed Deferral of Third-Party Risk Analysis State" ;
proeth:subject "Client B's direction to proceed without conducting the detailed climate and hydraulic impact analysis recommended by Engineer A" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Client B authorizing the evaluation, or Engineer A withdrawing from the project" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A should engage Client B in discussions about the need for the detailed evaluation and disclosure of the potential impacts on the public and alternatives for the project to mitigate those impacts, and the potential risk to Client B of not evaluating the potential impacts",
"If Client B remains unconvinced, Engineer A should propose to Client B that engineer A provides the potential concern that may necessitate more detailed evaluation in an engineering report for consideration by regulatory agencies and the public" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Client B's refusal to authorize the detailed, complex evaluation of future climate conditions and their impact on third-party properties" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 88 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T10:32:26.872770"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 88 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
88
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T06:42:52.571341+00:00
First case
88
Generated
2026-02-27T06:42:52.571341+00:00
Attributed to
Case 88 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T10:32:26.872770
Generated by
ProEthica Case 88 Extraction