Public Safety at Risk from Inadequate Storm Surge Design Standard
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/87#Public_Safety_at_Risk_from_Inadequate_Storm_Surge_Design_Standard
Properties
Instance of
Active period
From Engineer A's determination that the lower standard is inadequate through either adoption of the recommended standard or completion of construction to an inadequate standard
Affected parties
Client A
Engineer A
Future residents of the development
General public in the geographic area
Confidence
0.93
Importance
high
Subject
Future residents and general public exposed to foreseeable storm surge risk if the lower design standard is adopted
Terminated by
Adoption of the 100-year storm surge elevation standard or Engineer A's withdrawal and governmental code reform
Triggering event
Engineer A's technically grounded determination that a less stringent standard than 100-year storm surge elevation would place future residents and the general public at risk
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A has determined, based on historical weather patterns and data, that the residential development project should be built to a 100-year projected storm surge elevation.
Text references
Engineer A has determined, based on historical weather patterns and data, that the residential development project should be built to a 100-year projected storm surge elevation.
a less stringent standard would place future residents, as well as the general public, at risk and have the potential to cause significant property and environmental damage
TTL
@prefix case87: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/87#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case87:Public_Safety_at_Risk_from_Inadequate_Storm_Surge_Design_Standard a proeth:PublicSafetyatRisk,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Public Safety at Risk from Inadequate Storm Surge Design Standard" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From Engineer A's determination that the lower standard is inadequate through either adoption of the recommended standard or completion of construction to an inadequate standard" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client A",
"Engineer A",
"Future residents of the development",
"General public in the geographic area" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.93" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "87" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T15:32:20.581418+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "87" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T15:32:20.581418+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A has determined, based on historical weather patterns and data, that the residential development project should be built to a 100-year projected storm surge elevation." ;
proeth:stateclass "Public Safety at Risk" ;
proeth:subject "Future residents and general public exposed to foreseeable storm surge risk if the lower design standard is adopted" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Adoption of the 100-year storm surge elevation standard or Engineer A's withdrawal and governmental code reform" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A has determined, based on historical weather patterns and data, that the residential development project should be built to a 100-year projected storm surge elevation.",
"a less stringent standard would place future residents, as well as the general public, at risk and have the potential to cause significant property and environmental damage" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A's technically grounded determination that a less stringent standard than 100-year storm surge elevation would place future residents and the general public at risk" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 87 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T16:34:23.731716"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 87 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
87
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T15:32:20.581418+00:00
First case
87
Generated
2026-02-27T15:32:20.581418+00:00
Attributed to
Case 87 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T16:34:23.731716
Generated by
ProEthica Case 87 Extraction