Engineer A Coastal Risk Assessment Building Code Advocacy
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/87#Engineer_A_Coastal_Risk_Assessment_Building_Code_Advocacy
Properties
Instance of
BuildingCodeAdvocacyforStormSurgeProtectionObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#BuildingCodeAdvocacyforStormSurgeProtectionObligation
Case context
The geographic area has no applicable building code governing storm surge elevation; Engineer A identified a public safety risk arising from this regulatory gap
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.87
Importance
medium
Obligated party
Engineer A (coastal risk assessment, present case)
Obligation statement
Engineer A should consider contacting local government officials to advocate for the implementation of appropriate and updated region-wide building codes in all jurisdictions for the geographical area where or near where the residential development project is being built, addressing 100-year storm surge elevation requirements.
Temporal scope
After withdrawing from the project or upon determining that the regulatory gap creates a broader public safety risk requiring advocacy
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Post-Client-Refusal Regional Code Advocacy Obligation
derivedFromPrinciple
Building Code Advocacy Engineer Principle Invoked by Engineer A
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A should also consider contacting local government officials to advocate for the implementation of appropriate and updated region-wide building codes in all jurisdictions for the geographical area where or near where the residential development project is being built.
Text references
Engineer A should also consider contacting local government officials to advocate for the implementation of appropriate and updated region-wide building codes in all jurisdictions for the geographical area where or near where the residential development project is being built.
TTL
@prefix case87: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/87#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case87:Engineer_A_Coastal_Risk_Assessment_Building_Code_Advocacy a proeth:BuildingCodeAdvocacyforStormSurgeProtectionObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Coastal Risk Assessment Building Code Advocacy" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case87:Post-Client-Refusal_Regional_Code_Advocacy_Obligation ;
proeth:casecontext "The geographic area has no applicable building code governing storm surge elevation; Engineer A identified a public safety risk arising from this regulatory gap" ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.87" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case87:Building_Code_Advocacy_Engineer_Principle_Invoked_by_Engineer_A ;
proeth:discoveredincase "87" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T15:43:01.811893+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "87" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T15:43:01.811893+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (coastal risk assessment, present case)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Building Code Advocacy for Storm Surge Protection Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A should consider contacting local government officials to advocate for the implementation of appropriate and updated region-wide building codes in all jurisdictions for the geographical area where or near where the residential development project is being built, addressing 100-year storm surge elevation requirements." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A should also consider contacting local government officials to advocate for the implementation of appropriate and updated region-wide building codes in all jurisdictions for the geographical area where or near where the residential development project is being built." ;
proeth:temporalscope "After withdrawing from the project or upon determining that the regulatory gap creates a broader public safety risk requiring advocacy" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A should also consider contacting local government officials to advocate for the implementation of appropriate and updated region-wide building codes in all jurisdictions for the geographical area where or near where the residential development project is being built." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 87 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T16:34:23.746682"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 87 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
87
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T15:43:01.811893+00:00
First case
87
Generated
2026-02-27T15:43:01.811893+00:00
Attributed to
Case 87 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T16:34:23.746682
Generated by
ProEthica Case 87 Extraction