Confirmed Risk Without Adequate Safeguards — Storm Surge Elevation
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/87#Confirmed_Risk_Without_Adequate_Safeguards_—_Storm_Surge_Elevation
Properties
Instance of
ConfirmedRiskWithoutAdequateSafeguardsState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ConfirmedRiskWithoutAdequateSafeguardsState
Active period
From client refusal of the 100-year storm surge recommendation through resolution
Affected parties
Client A
Engineer A
Future residents
General public
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Subject
The identified storm surge risk to the coastal residential development and the client's refusal to implement the recommended protective standard
Terminated by
Client accepts recommendation, engineer withdraws, or risk is formally disclosed to appropriate authorities
Triggering event
Engineer A completed analysis confirming public safety risk at lower storm surge projections; client explicitly refused to implement the recommended 100-year elevation standard
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A believes the residential development project should be built to a 100-year projected storm surge elevation, due to public safety risks even at lower projections of future surge level rise.
Text references
Because of the increased cost, Owner refuses to agree that the residential development project be built to a 100-year projection storm surge elevation.
Engineer A believes the residential development project should be built to a 100-year projected storm surge elevation, due to public safety risks even at lower projections of future surge level rise.
TTL
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/87#Confirmed_Risk_Without_Adequate_Safeguards_—_Storm_Surge_Elevation> a proeth:ConfirmedRiskWithoutAdequateSafeguardsState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Confirmed Risk Without Adequate Safeguards — Storm Surge Elevation" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From client refusal of the 100-year storm surge recommendation through resolution" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client A",
"Engineer A",
"Future residents",
"General public" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "87" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T15:31:33.548526+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "87" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T15:31:33.548526+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A believes the residential development project should be built to a 100-year projected storm surge elevation, due to public safety risks even at lower projections of future surge level rise." ;
proeth:stateclass "Confirmed Risk Without Adequate Safeguards State" ;
proeth:subject "The identified storm surge risk to the coastal residential development and the client's refusal to implement the recommended protective standard" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Client accepts recommendation, engineer withdraws, or risk is formally disclosed to appropriate authorities" ;
proeth:textreferences "Because of the increased cost, Owner refuses to agree that the residential development project be built to a 100-year projection storm surge elevation.",
"Engineer A believes the residential development project should be built to a 100-year projected storm surge elevation, due to public safety risks even at lower projections of future surge level rise." ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A completed analysis confirming public safety risk at lower storm surge projections; client explicitly refused to implement the recommended 100-year elevation standard" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 87 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T16:34:23.730330"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 87 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
87
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-27T15:31:33.548526+00:00
First case
87
Generated
2026-02-27T15:31:33.548526+00:00
Attributed to
Case 87 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T16:34:23.730330
Generated by
ProEthica Case 87 Extraction