Engineer A Wetland Post-Engagement Reporting
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/86#Engineer_A_Wetland_Post-Engagement_Reporting
Definition
Engineer A was obligated to report the client's substantial violation of federal and state wetland laws to the appropriate regulatory authority if the client failed to remediate, notwithstanding the conclusion of the wetland delineation engagement.
Properties
Instance of
Post-EngagementViolationReportingObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Post-EngagementViolationReportingObligation
Case context
Engineer A discovered the unpermitted fill after the wetland delineation engagement had concluded. The Board held that post-engagement discovery of a substantial environmental law violation triggers a reporting obligation to appropriate authorities.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.92
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to report the client's substantial violation of federal and state wetland laws to the appropriate regulatory authority if the client failed to remediate, notwithstanding the conclusion of the wetland delineation engagement.
Temporal scope
After conclusion of the wetland delineation engagement, upon discovery of the violation
Match Confidence
0.0
Matches Existing
false
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
complianceStatus
confidence
obligationClass
obligationStatement
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
obligatedParty
Agent Engineer A
derivedFromPrinciple
Engineer A Post-Engagement Disclosure Duty
Source Evidence
Text references
If appropriate steps are not taken by the client, the engineer would have an obligation to bring this matter to the attention of the appropriate authorities.
Source text
If appropriate steps are not taken by the client, the engineer would have an obligation to bring this matter to the attention of the appropriate authorities.
TTL
@prefix case86: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/86#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case86:Engineer_A_Wetland_Post-Engagement_Reporting a proeth:Post-EngagementViolationReportingObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Wetland Post-Engagement Reporting" ;
proeth-core:obligatedParty case86:Agent_Engineer_A ;
proeth:caseContext "Engineer A discovered the unpermitted fill after the wetland delineation engagement had concluded. The Board held that post-engagement discovery of a substantial environmental law violation triggers a reporting obligation to appropriate authorities." ;
proeth:complianceStatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case86:Engineer_A_Post-Engagement_Disclosure_Duty ;
proeth:obligatedParty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationClass "Post-Engagement Violation Reporting Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationStatement "Engineer A was obligated to report the client's substantial violation of federal and state wetland laws to the appropriate regulatory authority if the client failed to remediate, notwithstanding the conclusion of the wetland delineation engagement." ;
proeth:temporalScope "After conclusion of the wetland delineation engagement, upon discovery of the violation" ;
proeth:textReferences "If appropriate steps are not taken by the client, the engineer would have an obligation to bring this matter to the attention of the appropriate authorities." ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 86 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T17:34:19.889581+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 86 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "If appropriate steps are not taken by the client, the engineer would have an obligation to bring this matter to the attention of the appropriate authorities." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext",
"complianceStatus",
"confidence",
"obligationClass",
"obligationStatement",
"temporalScope",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer A was obligated to report the client's substantial violation of federal and state wetland laws to the appropriate regulatory authority if the client failed to remediate, notwithstanding the conclusion of the wetland delineation engagement." ;
skos:definition "Engineer A was obligated to report the client's substantial violation of federal and state wetland laws to the appropriate regulatory authority if the client failed to remediate, notwithstanding the conclusion of the wetland delineation engagement." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T17:34:19.889581+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 86 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 86 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
86
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-06-04T17:34:19.889581+00:00
First case
86
Generated
2026-06-04T17:34:19.889581+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 86 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 86 Extraction