Engineer A Bridge Field Notes Preservation
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/86#Engineer_A_Bridge_Field_Notes_Preservation
Definition
Engineer A was obligated to retain the observations about the defective bridge wall condition in engineering notes without alteration, even after agreeing not to include that information in the final written report.
Properties
Instance of
FieldNotesPreservationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#FieldNotesPreservationObligation
Case context
During bridge inspection services limited to pavement damage, Engineer A observed an apparent pre-existing defective wall condition. The client asked Engineer A not to include this in the final report. Engineer A agreed to retain the information in notes only.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.87
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to retain the observations about the defective bridge wall condition in engineering notes without alteration, even after agreeing not to include that information in the final written report.
Temporal scope
From the time of observation through the conclusion of the engagement and beyond
Match Confidence
0.0
Matches Existing
false
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
complianceStatus
confidence
obligationClass
obligationStatement
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
competesWith
Engineer A Bridge Speculative Finding Exclusion
obligatedParty
Agent Engineer A
derivedFromPrinciple
Engineer A Bridge Faithful Agent Limits
Source Evidence
Text references
Engineer A stated that he would retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested.
However, under no circumstance would it be appropriate for Engineer A to alter his field notes.
Source text
However, under no circumstance would it be appropriate for Engineer A to alter his field notes.
TTL
@prefix case86: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/86#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case86:Engineer_A_Bridge_Field_Notes_Preservation a proeth:FieldNotesPreservationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Bridge Field Notes Preservation" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case86:Engineer_A_Bridge_Speculative_Finding_Exclusion ;
proeth-core:obligatedParty case86:Agent_Engineer_A ;
proeth:caseContext "During bridge inspection services limited to pavement damage, Engineer A observed an apparent pre-existing defective wall condition. The client asked Engineer A not to include this in the final report. Engineer A agreed to retain the information in notes only." ;
proeth:complianceStatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.87" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case86:Engineer_A_Bridge_Faithful_Agent_Limits ;
proeth:obligatedParty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationClass "Field Notes Preservation Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationStatement "Engineer A was obligated to retain the observations about the defective bridge wall condition in engineering notes without alteration, even after agreeing not to include that information in the final written report." ;
proeth:temporalScope "From the time of observation through the conclusion of the engagement and beyond" ;
proeth:textReferences "Engineer A stated that he would retain the information from his engineering notes but not include it in the final report, as requested.",
"However, under no circumstance would it be appropriate for Engineer A to alter his field notes." ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 86 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T17:34:19.889581+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 86 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "However, under no circumstance would it be appropriate for Engineer A to alter his field notes." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext",
"complianceStatus",
"confidence",
"obligationClass",
"obligationStatement",
"temporalScope",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer A was obligated to retain the observations about the defective bridge wall condition in engineering notes without alteration, even after agreeing not to include that information in the final written report." ;
skos:definition "Engineer A was obligated to retain the observations about the defective bridge wall condition in engineering notes without alteration, even after agreeing not to include that information in the final written report." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T17:34:19.889581+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 86 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 86 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
86
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-06-04T17:34:19.889581+00:00
First case
86
Generated
2026-06-04T17:34:19.889581+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 86 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 86 Extraction