Engineer A Cost Allocation Neutrality
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/85#Engineer_A_Cost_Allocation_Neutrality
Definition
Engineer A was obligated to make the decision to submit complete and adequate drawings and specifications without regard to his assumption that federal funds rather than local funds would absorb any cost overruns resulting from the deficiencies.
Properties
Instance of
CostAllocationNeutralityObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CostAllocationNeutralityObligation
Case context
Engineer A rationalized submitting incomplete drawings and specifications in part because he believed federal grant funds would cover any increased costs, rather than basing his submission decision on the professional adequacy of the documents.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.87
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to make the decision to submit complete and adequate drawings and specifications without regard to his assumption that federal funds rather than local funds would absorb any cost overruns resulting from the deficiencies.
Temporal scope
At the time of deciding to submit the incomplete drawings and specifications
Match Confidence
0.0
Matches Existing
false
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
complianceStatus
confidence
obligationClass
obligationStatement
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Engineer A Federal Funding Assumption
obligatedParty
Agent Engineer A
derivedFromPrinciple
Engineer A Cost Allocation Bias, Engineer A Cost Allocation Rationalization
Source Evidence
Text references
Engineer A was confident that sufficient federal funds (and not local funding) would cover any potential increased costs
Source text
Engineer A was confident that sufficient federal funds (and not local funding) would cover any potential increased costs
TTL
@prefix case85: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/85#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case85:Engineer_A_Cost_Allocation_Neutrality a proeth:CostAllocationNeutralityObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Cost Allocation Neutrality" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case85:Engineer_A_Federal_Funding_Assumption ;
proeth-core:obligatedParty case85:Agent_Engineer_A ;
proeth:caseContext "Engineer A rationalized submitting incomplete drawings and specifications in part because he believed federal grant funds would cover any increased costs, rather than basing his submission decision on the professional adequacy of the documents." ;
proeth:complianceStatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.87" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case85:Engineer_A_Cost_Allocation_Bias,
case85:Engineer_A_Cost_Allocation_Rationalization ;
proeth:obligatedParty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationClass "Cost Allocation Neutrality Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationStatement "Engineer A was obligated to make the decision to submit complete and adequate drawings and specifications without regard to his assumption that federal funds rather than local funds would absorb any cost overruns resulting from the deficiencies." ;
proeth:temporalScope "At the time of deciding to submit the incomplete drawings and specifications" ;
proeth:textReferences "Engineer A was confident that sufficient federal funds (and not local funding) would cover any potential increased costs" ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 85 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T16:50:13.568162+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 85 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "Engineer A was confident that sufficient federal funds (and not local funding) would cover any potential increased costs" ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext",
"complianceStatus",
"confidence",
"obligationClass",
"obligationStatement",
"temporalScope",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer A was obligated to make the decision to submit complete and adequate drawings and specifications without regard to his assumption that federal funds rather than local funds would absorb any cost overruns resulting from the deficiencies." ;
skos:definition "Engineer A was obligated to make the decision to submit complete and adequate drawings and specifications without regard to his assumption that federal funds rather than local funds would absorb any cost overruns resulting from the deficiencies." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T16:50:13.568162+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 85 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 85 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
85
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-06-04T16:50:13.568162+00:00
First case
85
Generated
2026-06-04T16:50:13.568162+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 85 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 85 Extraction