Engineer A Competence Dam Drawings
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/85#Engineer_A_Competence_Dam_Drawings_Obligation
Definition
Engineer A was obligated to produce drawings and specifications that were complete, technically adequate, and buildable, and to refrain from submitting work products that he knew did not meet the standard of care for dam design.
Properties
Instance of
Case context
Engineer A produced drawings and specifications for a dam that were materially incomplete and contained elements a contractor found unbuildable, indicating that the work product did not meet the professional standard of care.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.91
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to produce drawings and specifications that were complete, technically adequate, and buildable, and to refrain from submitting work products that he knew did not meet the standard of care for dam design.
Temporal scope
Throughout the design and production of the drawings and specifications
Match Confidence
0.95
Match Reasoning
Individual typed as existing ontology class 'Competence Obligation'
Matched Ontology Label
Competence Obligation
Matches Existing
true
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
complianceStatus
confidence
obligationClass
obligationStatement
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
obligatedParty
Agent Engineer A
derivedFromPrinciple
Engineer A Professional Competence Dam Drawings
Source Evidence
Text references
Engineer A generally agrees with Hi-Lo's characterization
much of the design detail is lacking in the drawings and specifications and that Hi-Lo Construction declares that certain parts of the project are 'unbuildable' without major changes
Source text
much of the design detail is lacking in the drawings and specifications and that Hi-Lo Construction declares that certain parts of the project are 'unbuildable' without major changes
TTL
@prefix case85: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/85#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case85:Engineer_A_Competence_Dam_Drawings_Obligation a proeth:CompetenceObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Competence Dam Drawings" ;
proeth-core:obligatedParty case85:Agent_Engineer_A ;
proeth:caseContext "Engineer A produced drawings and specifications for a dam that were materially incomplete and contained elements a contractor found unbuildable, indicating that the work product did not meet the professional standard of care." ;
proeth:complianceStatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case85:Engineer_A_Professional_Competence_Dam_Drawings ;
proeth:obligatedParty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationClass "Competence Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationStatement "Engineer A was obligated to produce drawings and specifications that were complete, technically adequate, and buildable, and to refrain from submitting work products that he knew did not meet the standard of care for dam design." ;
proeth:temporalScope "Throughout the design and production of the drawings and specifications" ;
proeth:textReferences "Engineer A generally agrees with Hi-Lo's characterization",
"much of the design detail is lacking in the drawings and specifications and that Hi-Lo Construction declares that certain parts of the project are 'unbuildable' without major changes" ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 85 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T16:50:13.568162+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 85 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.95 ;
proeth-prov:matchReasoning "Individual typed as existing ontology class 'Competence Obligation'" ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass proeth:CompetenceObligation ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "Competence Obligation" ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "much of the design detail is lacking in the drawings and specifications and that Hi-Lo Construction declares that certain parts of the project are 'unbuildable' without major changes" ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext",
"complianceStatus",
"confidence",
"obligationClass",
"obligationStatement",
"temporalScope",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer A was obligated to produce drawings and specifications that were complete, technically adequate, and buildable, and to refrain from submitting work products that he knew did not meet the standard of care for dam design." ;
skos:definition "Engineer A was obligated to produce drawings and specifications that were complete, technically adequate, and buildable, and to refrain from submitting work products that he knew did not meet the standard of care for dam design." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T16:50:13.568162+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 85 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 85 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
85
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-06-04T16:50:13.568162+00:00
First case
85
Generated
2026-06-04T16:50:13.568162+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 85 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 85 Extraction