DP5
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/85#DP5
Properties
Instance of
Decision Point Id
DP5
Decision question
Should Engineer A treat time pressure and anticipated funding as sufficient justification for submitting incomplete documents without disclosure, or are those circumstances insufficient to override the disclosure obligation?
Focus
Engineer A submitted dam design documents while asserting that incompleteness was justified by time pressures and anticipated federal funding, raising the question of whether those circumstances constitute an adequate ethical justification for non-disclosure.
Option1
Treat the disclosure obligation as unconditional and formally notify all relevant parties of the incompleteness regardless of time pressures or funding status.
Option2
Treat the submission as a recognized phased deliverable under the project's funding structure, documenting the staged nature of the design in the project record and relying on the approving authority's familiarity with the funding context.
Option3
Refuse to submit incomplete documents and instead negotiate with the client for an extended deadline that allows for a complete submission, even at the risk of delaying the funding application.
Role
Engineer Contractor
TTL
@prefix case85: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/85#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
case85:DP5 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP5" ;
proeth:decisionPointId "DP5" ;
proeth:decisionQuestion "Should Engineer A treat time pressure and anticipated funding as sufficient justification for submitting incomplete documents without disclosure, or are those circumstances insufficient to override the disclosure obligation?" ;
proeth:focus "Engineer A submitted dam design documents while asserting that incompleteness was justified by time pressures and anticipated federal funding, raising the question of whether those circumstances constitute an adequate ethical justification for non-disclosure." ;
proeth:option1 "Treat the disclosure obligation as unconditional and formally notify all relevant parties of the incompleteness regardless of time pressures or funding status." ;
proeth:option2 "Treat the submission as a recognized phased deliverable under the project's funding structure, documenting the staged nature of the design in the project record and relying on the approving authority's familiarity with the funding context." ;
proeth:option3 "Refuse to submit incomplete documents and instead negotiate with the client for an extended deadline that allows for a complete submission, even at the risk of delaying the funding application." ;
proeth:roleLabel "Engineer Contractor" ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 85 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Attributed to
claude-sonnet-4-6
Generated by
ProEthica Case 85 Extraction