Engineer A Client Cost-Driven Safety Oversight Rejection (Case 84-5 Analogy)
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/84#Engineer_A_Client_Cost-Driven_Safety_Oversight_Rejection_Case_84-5_Analogy
Properties
Instance of
ClientCost-DrivenSafetyOversightRejectionState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientCost-DrivenSafetyOversightRejectionState
Active period
From client's refusal to hire on-site project representative through engineer's continued work without dissent
Affected parties
Client (Case 84-5)
Engineer (Case 84-5)
Project workers and public
Confidence
0.9
Importance
medium
Subject
The analogous state from Case 84-5 referenced in the discussion, where a client refused to fund a full-time on-site project representative recommended by the engineer on safety grounds, and the engineer proceeded without insisting or withdrawing
Terminated by
Not terminated within the referenced case — engineer proceeded without resolution
Triggering event
Client's determination that the project would be too costly if a full-time on-site project representative were hired, leading to refusal of the engineer's safety recommendation
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
the client indicated to the engineer that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired
Text references
If the engineer's ethical concerns were real, the engineer should have insisted that the client hire the on-site project representative or refuse to continue to work on the project
the client indicated to the engineer that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired
the engineer acceded to the client's wishes and proceeded with the work despite the fact that the engineer believed that to proceed without an on-site project representative would be potentially dangerous
TTL
@prefix case84: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/84#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case84:Engineer_A_Client_Cost-Driven_Safety_Oversight_Rejection_Case_84-5_Analogy a proeth:ClientCost-DrivenSafetyOversightRejectionState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Client Cost-Driven Safety Oversight Rejection (Case 84-5 Analogy)" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From client's refusal to hire on-site project representative through engineer's continued work without dissent" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client (Case 84-5)",
"Engineer (Case 84-5)",
"Project workers and public" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "84" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T13:32:42.161515+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "84" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T13:32:42.161515+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:sourcetext "the client indicated to the engineer that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired" ;
proeth:stateclass "Client Cost-Driven Safety Oversight Rejection State" ;
proeth:subject "The analogous state from Case 84-5 referenced in the discussion, where a client refused to fund a full-time on-site project representative recommended by the engineer on safety grounds, and the engineer proceeded without insisting or withdrawing" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Not terminated within the referenced case — engineer proceeded without resolution" ;
proeth:textreferences "If the engineer's ethical concerns were real, the engineer should have insisted that the client hire the on-site project representative or refuse to continue to work on the project",
"the client indicated to the engineer that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired",
"the engineer acceded to the client's wishes and proceeded with the work despite the fact that the engineer believed that to proceed without an on-site project representative would be potentially dangerous" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Client's determination that the project would be too costly if a full-time on-site project representative were hired, leading to refusal of the engineer's safety recommendation" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 84 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T13:56:58.159505"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 84 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
84
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T13:32:42.161515+00:00
First case
84
Generated
2026-03-01T13:32:42.161515+00:00
Attributed to
Case 84 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T13:56:58.159505
Generated by
ProEthica Case 84 Extraction