Client-Confidentiality-vs-Public-Safety-Balancing-Framework
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/84#Client-Confidentiality-vs-Public-Safety-Balancing-Framework
Properties
Instance of
ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework
Confidence
0.95
Created by
Professional engineering ethics bodies
Document title
Client Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework
Importance
high
Used by
Engineer A when deciding whether to report safety violations to third parties despite confidentiality terms
Used in context
Governs how Engineer A must weigh the contractual confidentiality agreement against the paramount obligation to protect occupants from known electrical and mechanical hazards that violate applicable codes
Source Evidence
Source text
Under the terms of the agreement with the client, the structural report written by Engineer A is to remain confidential
Text references
Engineer A does not report the safety violations to any third party
Under the terms of the agreement with the client, the structural report written by Engineer A is to remain confidential
TTL
@prefix case84: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/84#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case84:Client-Confidentiality-vs-Public-Safety-Balancing-Framework a proeth:ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Client-Confidentiality-vs-Public-Safety-Balancing-Framework" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:createdby "Professional engineering ethics bodies" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "84" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Client Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T13:30:36.563028+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "84" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T13:30:36.563028+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Client Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Under the terms of the agreement with the client, the structural report written by Engineer A is to remain confidential" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A does not report the safety violations to any third party",
"Under the terms of the agreement with the client, the structural report written by Engineer A is to remain confidential" ;
proeth:usedby "Engineer A when deciding whether to report safety violations to third parties despite confidentiality terms" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Governs how Engineer A must weigh the contractual confidentiality agreement against the paramount obligation to protect occupants from known electrical and mechanical hazards that violate applicable codes" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 84 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T13:56:58.165201"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 84 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
84
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T13:30:36.563028+00:00
First case
84
Generated
2026-03-01T13:30:36.563028+00:00
Attributed to
Case 84 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T13:56:58.165201
Generated by
ProEthica Case 84 Extraction