Faithful Agent Obligation Within Ethical Limits Applied to Developer Client Relationship

P · Principle Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/83#Faithful_Agent_Obligation_Within_Ethical_Limits_Applied_to_Developer_Client_Relationship
Properties
Instance of
FaithfulAgentObligationWithinEthicalLimits
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#FaithfulAgentObligationWithinEthicalLimits
Applied to
Developer Client Residential Condominium engagement
Balancing with
Objective Completeness in Public Authority Reports
Public Welfare Paramount
Threatened Species Environmental Reporting Obligation
Concrete expression
Engineer A's role as the developer client's retained environmental engineering firm creates a faithful agent obligation to serve the client's development interests, but this obligation is bounded by the ethical duty to include all material findings in the written report submitted to the public authority — the faithful agent role does not authorize omission of adverse environmental findings from regulatory submissions
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Interpretation
The faithful agent obligation explains why Engineer A verbally disclosed the threatened species concern to the developer client, but it does not justify the omission of that finding from the written regulatory submission; the ethical limits of the faithful agent role are precisely that the engineer cannot suppress material findings from public regulatory authorities even at the client's implicit or explicit preference
Invoked by
Engineer A Environmental Firm Principal
Tension resolution
The faithful agent obligation is subordinated to the public welfare and regulatory completeness obligations when the client's interests conflict with full written disclosure to the public authority
Source Evidence
Source text
In subsequent discussions with the developer client, Engineer A verbally mentions the concern, but Engineer A does not include the information in a written report that will be submitted to a public authority that is considering the developer's proposal

Text references
Engineer A is a principal in an environmental engineering firm and is requested by a developer client to prepare an analysis of a piece of property adjacent to a wetlands area for potential development as a residential condominium
In subsequent discussions with the developer client, Engineer A verbally mentions the concern, but Engineer A does not include the information in a written report that will be submitted to a public authority
TTL
@prefix case83: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/83#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case83:Faithful_Agent_Obligation_Within_Ethical_Limits_Applied_to_Developer_Client_Relationship a proeth:FaithfulAgentObligationWithinEthicalLimits, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Faithful Agent Obligation Within Ethical Limits Applied to Developer Client Relationship" ; proeth:appliedto "Developer Client Residential Condominium engagement" ; proeth:balancingwith "Objective Completeness in Public Authority Reports", "Public Welfare Paramount", "Threatened Species Environmental Reporting Obligation" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ; proeth:concreteexpression "Engineer A's role as the developer client's retained environmental engineering firm creates a faithful agent obligation to serve the client's development interests, but this obligation is bounded by the ethical duty to include all material findings in the written report submitted to the public authority — the faithful agent role does not authorize omission of adverse environmental findings from regulatory submissions" ; proeth:confidence "0.88" ; proeth:discoveredincase "83" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T18:58:06.313476+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "83" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T18:58:06.313476+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:interpretation "The faithful agent obligation explains why Engineer A verbally disclosed the threatened species concern to the developer client, but it does not justify the omission of that finding from the written regulatory submission; the ethical limits of the faithful agent role are precisely that the engineer cannot suppress material findings from public regulatory authorities even at the client's implicit or explicit preference" ; proeth:invokedby "Engineer A Environmental Firm Principal" ; proeth:principleclass "Faithful Agent Obligation Within Ethical Limits" ; proeth:sourcetext "In subsequent discussions with the developer client, Engineer A verbally mentions the concern, but Engineer A does not include the information in a written report that will be submitted to a public authority that is considering the developer's proposal" ; proeth:tensionresolution "The faithful agent obligation is subordinated to the public welfare and regulatory completeness obligations when the client's interests conflict with full written disclosure to the public authority" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A is a principal in an environmental engineering firm and is requested by a developer client to prepare an analysis of a piece of property adjacent to a wetlands area for potential development as a residential condominium", "In subsequent discussions with the developer client, Engineer A verbally mentions the concern, but Engineer A does not include the information in a written report that will be submitted to a public authority" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 83 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T19:15:08.298114"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 83 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
83
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-27T18:58:06.313476+00:00
First case
83
Generated
2026-02-27T18:58:06.313476+00:00
Attributed to
Case 83 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T19:15:08.298114
Generated by
ProEthica Case 83 Extraction