Engineer A Threatened Species Written Report Inclusion Obligation Instance

O · Obligation Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/83#Engineer_A_Threatened_Species_Written_Report_Inclusion_Obligation_Instance
Properties
Instance of
ThreatenedSpeciesReportInclusionObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ThreatenedSpeciesReportInclusionObligation
Case context
Engineer A's environmental engineering firm was retained by a developer to analyze property adjacent to a protected wetlands area for residential condominium development. The firm's biologist reported to Engineer A that the project could threaten a bird species classified as 'threatened' (not 'endangered') by federal and state regulators. Engineer A verbally mentioned the concern to the developer client but omitted it from the written report submitted to the public authority.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.97
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A (principal, environmental engineering firm)
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to include the firm biologist's finding that the condominium project could threaten a bird species classified as 'threatened' by federal and state environmental regulators in the written report submitted to the public authority considering the developer's proposal, and to advise the developer client of its inclusion.
Temporal scope
At the time of preparing and submitting the written report to the public authority
Source Evidence
Source text
one of the engineering firm's biologists reports to Engineer A that in his opinion, the condominium project could threaten a bird species that inhabits the adjacent protected wetlands area

Text references
Engineer A does not include the information in a written report that will be submitted to a public authority that is considering the developer's proposal
The bird species is not an 'endangered species,' but it is considered a 'threatened species' by federal and state environmental regulators
one of the engineering firm's biologists reports to Engineer A that in his opinion, the condominium project could threaten a bird species that inhabits the adjacent protected wetlands area
TTL
@prefix case83: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/83#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case83:Engineer_A_Threatened_Species_Written_Report_Inclusion_Obligation_Instance a proeth:ThreatenedSpeciesReportInclusionObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Threatened Species Written Report Inclusion Obligation Instance" ; proeth-core:competesWith case83:Engineer_A_Environmental_Principal_Client_Confidentiality_Non-Invocation_Disclosure_Facilitation_Current_Case, case83:Engineer_A_Environmental_Principal_Faithful_Agent_Bounded_by_Public_Welfare_Current_Case, case83:Engineer_A_Faithful_Agent_Within_Ethical_Limits_Developer_Client_Obligation_Instance ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case83:Present_Case_Threatened_Species_Habitat_Proximity_Development ; proeth-core:prevailsOver case83:Engineer_A_Faithful_Agent_Within_Ethical_Limits_Developer_Client_Obligation_Instance ; proeth:casecontext "Engineer A's environmental engineering firm was retained by a developer to analyze property adjacent to a protected wetlands area for residential condominium development. The firm's biologist reported to Engineer A that the project could threaten a bird species classified as 'threatened' (not 'endangered') by federal and state regulators. Engineer A verbally mentioned the concern to the developer client but omitted it from the written report submitted to the public authority." ; proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.97" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case83:Threatened_Species_Environmental_Reporting_Obligation_Violated_by_Engineer_A, case83:Written_Report_Completeness_Obligation_Applied_to_Threatened_Species_Finding ; proeth:discoveredincase "83" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T18:59:29.260448+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "83" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T18:59:29.260448+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (principal, environmental engineering firm)" ; proeth:obligationclass "Threatened Species Report Inclusion Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to include the firm biologist's finding that the condominium project could threaten a bird species classified as 'threatened' by federal and state environmental regulators in the written report submitted to the public authority considering the developer's proposal, and to advise the developer client of its inclusion." ; proeth:sourcetext "one of the engineering firm's biologists reports to Engineer A that in his opinion, the condominium project could threaten a bird species that inhabits the adjacent protected wetlands area" ; proeth:temporalscope "At the time of preparing and submitting the written report to the public authority" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A does not include the information in a written report that will be submitted to a public authority that is considering the developer's proposal", "The bird species is not an 'endangered species,' but it is considered a 'threatened species' by federal and state environmental regulators", "one of the engineering firm's biologists reports to Engineer A that in his opinion, the condominium project could threaten a bird species that inhabits the adjacent protected wetlands area" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 83 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T19:15:08.293646"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 83 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
83
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-27T18:59:29.260448+00:00
First case
83
Generated
2026-02-27T18:59:29.260448+00:00
Attributed to
Case 83 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T19:15:08.293646
Generated by
ProEthica Case 83 Extraction