Engineer A Technically Confirmed Environmental Finding — Omission Instruction
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/83#Engineer_A_Technically_Confirmed_Environmental_Finding_—_Omission_Instruction
Properties
Instance of
TechnicallyConfirmedEnvironmentalFindingOmissionInstructionState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#TechnicallyConfirmedEnvironmentalFindingOmissionInstructionState
Active period
From Engineer A's completion of environmental assessment with biologist consultation through client's implicit omission pressure and Board determination
Affected parties
Client/Developer
Engineer A
General public
Public regulatory authority
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's confirmed threatened species habitat finding and client instruction or pressure to omit from final report
Terminated by
Board determination that Engineer A must include finding in report and advise client
Triggering event
Engineer A's technically confirmed finding of threatened species habitat, supported by domain competence and qualified biologist consultation, combined with absence of prior client confidentiality request
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
as an environmental engineer with consultation by an apparently qualified biologist, it appears that Engineer A has technical competence concerning the matter in question
Text references
Engineer A, therefore, had an obligation to include it in the written report and advise the client of its inclusion
There does not appear to be any affirmative action on the part of the client to treat the information as confidential
as an environmental engineer with consultation by an apparently qualified biologist, it appears that Engineer A has technical competence concerning the matter in question
unlike BER Case No. 97-13, there is nothing in the facts that the conclusions reached are based upon surmise or speculation
TTL
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/83#Engineer_A_Technically_Confirmed_Environmental_Finding_—_Omission_Instruction> a proeth:TechnicallyConfirmedEnvironmentalFindingOmissionInstructionState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Technically Confirmed Environmental Finding — Omission Instruction" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From Engineer A's completion of environmental assessment with biologist consultation through client's implicit omission pressure and Board determination" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client/Developer",
"Engineer A",
"General public",
"Public regulatory authority" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "83" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T18:56:41.372529+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "83" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T18:56:41.372529+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "as an environmental engineer with consultation by an apparently qualified biologist, it appears that Engineer A has technical competence concerning the matter in question" ;
proeth:stateclass "Technically Confirmed Environmental Finding Omission Instruction State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's confirmed threatened species habitat finding and client instruction or pressure to omit from final report" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Board determination that Engineer A must include finding in report and advise client" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A, therefore, had an obligation to include it in the written report and advise the client of its inclusion",
"There does not appear to be any affirmative action on the part of the client to treat the information as confidential",
"as an environmental engineer with consultation by an apparently qualified biologist, it appears that Engineer A has technical competence concerning the matter in question",
"unlike BER Case No. 97-13, there is nothing in the facts that the conclusions reached are based upon surmise or speculation" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A's technically confirmed finding of threatened species habitat, supported by domain competence and qualified biologist consultation, combined with absence of prior client confidentiality request" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 83 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T19:15:08.290785"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 83 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
83
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T18:56:41.372529+00:00
First case
83
Generated
2026-02-27T18:56:41.372529+00:00
Attributed to
Case 83 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T19:15:08.290785
Generated by
ProEthica Case 83 Extraction