Engineer A Sustainable Development Threatened Species Advocacy Obligation Instance
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/83#Engineer_A_Sustainable_Development_Threatened_Species_Advocacy_Obligation_Instance
Properties
Instance of
SustainableDevelopmentIntegrationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#SustainableDevelopmentIntegrationObligation
Case context
Engineer A's role as principal in an environmental engineering firm conducting assessment of property adjacent to a protected wetlands area activated sustainable development obligations under NSPE Code III.2.d. The firm biologist's threatened species finding was directly relevant to sustainable development considerations that should have been reflected in the written report.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A (principal, environmental engineering firm)
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to actively consider and integrate sustainable development principles — including protection of threatened species and adjacent protected wetlands — into the environmental analysis and written report, and to ensure that the threatened species finding reported by the firm biologist was included in the written report submitted to the public authority as an expression of sustainable development advocacy.
Temporal scope
Throughout the environmental analysis and at the time of preparing the written report
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Sustainable Development Obligation Applied to Threatened Species Finding
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A is a principal in an environmental engineering firm and is requested by a developer client to prepare an analysis of a piece of property adjacent to a wetlands area for potential development as a residential condominium
Text references
Engineer A is a principal in an environmental engineering firm and is requested by a developer client to prepare an analysis of a piece of property adjacent to a wetlands area for potential development as a residential condominium
one of the engineering firm's biologists reports to Engineer A that in his opinion, the condominium project could threaten a bird species that inhabits the adjacent protected wetlands area
TTL
@prefix case83: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/83#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case83:Engineer_A_Sustainable_Development_Threatened_Species_Advocacy_Obligation_Instance a proeth:SustainableDevelopmentIntegrationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Sustainable Development Threatened Species Advocacy Obligation Instance" ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case83:Engineer_A_Faithful_Agent_Within_Ethical_Limits_Developer_Client_Obligation_Instance ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A's role as principal in an environmental engineering firm conducting assessment of property adjacent to a protected wetlands area activated sustainable development obligations under NSPE Code III.2.d. The firm biologist's threatened species finding was directly relevant to sustainable development considerations that should have been reflected in the written report." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case83:Sustainable_Development_Obligation_Applied_to_Threatened_Species_Finding ;
proeth:discoveredincase "83" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T18:59:29.260448+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "83" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T18:59:29.260448+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (principal, environmental engineering firm)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Sustainable Development Integration Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to actively consider and integrate sustainable development principles — including protection of threatened species and adjacent protected wetlands — into the environmental analysis and written report, and to ensure that the threatened species finding reported by the firm biologist was included in the written report submitted to the public authority as an expression of sustainable development advocacy." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A is a principal in an environmental engineering firm and is requested by a developer client to prepare an analysis of a piece of property adjacent to a wetlands area for potential development as a residential condominium" ;
proeth:temporalscope "Throughout the environmental analysis and at the time of preparing the written report" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A is a principal in an environmental engineering firm and is requested by a developer client to prepare an analysis of a piece of property adjacent to a wetlands area for potential development as a residential condominium",
"one of the engineering firm's biologists reports to Engineer A that in his opinion, the condominium project could threaten a bird species that inhabits the adjacent protected wetlands area" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 83 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T19:15:08.299114"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 83 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
83
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-27T18:59:29.260448+00:00
First case
83
Generated
2026-02-27T18:59:29.260448+00:00
Attributed to
Case 83 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T19:15:08.299114
Generated by
ProEthica Case 83 Extraction