Engineer A Client Verbal Mention Non-Substitution Obligation Instance
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/83#Engineer_A_Client_Verbal_Mention_Non-Substitution_Obligation_Instance
Properties
Instance of
ClientVerbalMentionNon-SubstitutionforPublicAuthorityWrittenDisclosureObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientVerbalMentionNon-SubstitutionforPublicAuthorityWrittenDisclosureObligation
Case context
Engineer A verbally mentioned the threatened species concern to the developer client but did not include it in the written report submitted to the public authority. The public authority was considering the developer's proposal and was relying on the written report for its regulatory decision-making.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A (principal, environmental engineering firm)
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to refrain from treating the verbal mention of the threatened species concern to the developer client as a substitute for inclusion of that finding in the written report submitted to the public regulatory authority, recognizing that the public authority's independent decision-making interest required complete written disclosure.
Temporal scope
At the time of preparing the written report for submission to the public authority
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Verbal-Only Threatened Species Advisory Without Written Record
derivedFromPrinciple
Written Report Completeness Obligation Applied to Threatened Species Finding
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A verbally mentions the concern, but Engineer A does not include the information in a written report that will be submitted to a public authority that is considering the developer's proposal
Text references
Engineer A verbally mentions the concern, but Engineer A does not include the information in a written report that will be submitted to a public authority that is considering the developer's proposal
TTL
@prefix case83: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/83#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case83:Engineer_A_Client_Verbal_Mention_Non-Substitution_Obligation_Instance a proeth:ClientVerbalMentionNon-SubstitutionforPublicAuthorityWrittenDisclosureObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Client Verbal Mention Non-Substitution Obligation Instance" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case83:Engineer_A_Objective_Complete_Reporting_Public_Authority_Obligation_Instance ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case83:Verbal-Only_Threatened_Species_Advisory_Without_Written_Record ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A verbally mentioned the threatened species concern to the developer client but did not include it in the written report submitted to the public authority. The public authority was considering the developer's proposal and was relying on the written report for its regulatory decision-making." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case83:Written_Report_Completeness_Obligation_Applied_to_Threatened_Species_Finding ;
proeth:discoveredincase "83" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T18:59:29.260448+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "83" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T18:59:29.260448+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (principal, environmental engineering firm)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Client Verbal Mention Non-Substitution for Public Authority Written Disclosure Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to refrain from treating the verbal mention of the threatened species concern to the developer client as a substitute for inclusion of that finding in the written report submitted to the public regulatory authority, recognizing that the public authority's independent decision-making interest required complete written disclosure." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A verbally mentions the concern, but Engineer A does not include the information in a written report that will be submitted to a public authority that is considering the developer's proposal" ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time of preparing the written report for submission to the public authority" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A verbally mentions the concern, but Engineer A does not include the information in a written report that will be submitted to a public authority that is considering the developer's proposal" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 83 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T19:15:08.298684"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 83 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
83
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-27T18:59:29.260448+00:00
First case
83
Generated
2026-02-27T18:59:29.260448+00:00
Attributed to
Case 83 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T19:15:08.298684
Generated by
ProEthica Case 83 Extraction