DP7
Individual
8ba9d21c
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/83#DP7
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP7
Decision Question
Should Engineer A include the in-house biologist's threatened species finding in the written report submitted to the public authority, or is verbal disclosure to the developer client a sufficient discharge of the reporting obligation?
Focus
Engineer A's obligation to include the biologist's threatened species finding in the written report submitted to the public authority, given the competing pressures of client service, scope of engagement, and mandatory completeness under NSPE Code Section II.3.a.
Option1
Include the biologist's threatened species finding in the written report submitted to the public authority, and notify the developer client in advance of its inclusion so the client can prepare a regulatory response or mitigation strategy
Option2
Disclose the threatened species finding verbally to the developer client and recommend that the client independently commission a separate biological survey before the public authority submission, treating the in-house biologist's preliminary finding as outside the contracted scope of the written report
Option3
Include a qualified reference to the threatened species concern in the written report using probabilistic framing — noting that a potential habitat risk was identified and recommending further specialist review — while deferring to the client's judgment on whether to commission and submit a full biological assessment to the authority
Role Label
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_83: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/83> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/83#DP7> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP7" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
8ba9d21c1b09cc8a...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-27T19:32:42.602130
Generated By
ProEthica Case 83 Extraction