DP4
Individual
9fb47c4b
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/83#DP4
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP4
Decision Question
Should Engineer A include the biologist's threatened species finding in the written report submitted to the public authority, given that Engineer A has already verbally disclosed the concern to the developer client who has not explicitly invoked confidentiality?
Focus
Engineer A's obligation to include the threatened species finding in the written report submitted to the public authority, and whether verbal disclosure to the developer client satisfies any portion of that obligation
Option1
Include the biologist's threatened species finding in the written report submitted to the public authority, and proactively notify the developer client of its inclusion before submission so the client can prepare a response
Option2
Treat the verbal disclosure to the developer client as satisfying the notification obligation, and omit the finding from the written report on the basis that the client — having been informed — bears responsibility for deciding whether to relay the information to the public authority
Option3
Append the biologist's finding as a separate advisory memorandum transmitted directly to the public authority outside the main written report, thereby preserving the report's contracted scope while ensuring the authority receives the material information
Role Label
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_83: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/83> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/83#DP4> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP4" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
9fb47c4b3fb6ae41...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-27T19:32:42.601908
Generated By
ProEthica Case 83 Extraction