Engineer A Civic Advocacy Employer Non-Interference Right
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/82#Engineer_A_Civic_Advocacy_Employer_Non-Interference_Right
Properties
Instance of
EngineerExtra-EmploymentCivicAdvocacyEmployerNon-InterferenceObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineerExtra-EmploymentCivicAdvocacyEmployerNon-InterferenceObligation
Case context
Engineer A's Citizens Committee activities were conducted without disclosure of confidential employer information and without naming XYZ Manufacturing or any specific company; the sole basis for the discharge threat was employer embarrassment.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Obligated party
XYZ Manufacturing Company / Engineer B
Obligation statement
XYZ Manufacturing Company and Engineer B were obligated to recognize and respect Engineer A's right to engage in extra-employment civic advocacy through the Citizens Committee — including public statements, newspaper letters, and legislative testimony — without threatening discharge, given that Engineer A had not disclosed confidential employer information and had not named specific companies.
Temporal scope
Throughout Engineer A's Citizens Committee activities and at the time of Engineer B's discharge warning
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer B, the supervisor of Engineer A, warned him that if he continued in his activities, he would be discharged because he was putting his employer in an embarrassing position
Text references
Engineer B, the supervisor of Engineer A, warned him that if he continued in his activities, he would be discharged because he was putting his employer in an embarrassing position
even though Engineer A had not mentioned the products of his employer or any other specific company in his activities on behalf of the Citizens Committee
TTL
@prefix case82: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/82#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case82:Engineer_A_Civic_Advocacy_Employer_Non-Interference_Right a proeth:EngineerExtra-EmploymentCivicAdvocacyEmployerNon-InterferenceObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Civic Advocacy Employer Non-Interference Right" ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A's Citizens Committee activities were conducted without disclosure of confidential employer information and without naming XYZ Manufacturing or any specific company; the sole basis for the discharge threat was employer embarrassment." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case82:Engineer_Extra-Employment_Civic_Advocacy_Freedom_Invoked_for_Engineer_As_Citizens_Committee_Activities,
case82:Engineer_Professional_Autonomy_Preservation_Invoked_for_Engineer_As_Advocacy_Independence ;
proeth:discoveredincase "82" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T13:39:58.179686+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "82" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T13:39:58.179686+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "XYZ Manufacturing Company / Engineer B" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Engineer Extra-Employment Civic Advocacy Employer Non-Interference Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "XYZ Manufacturing Company and Engineer B were obligated to recognize and respect Engineer A's right to engage in extra-employment civic advocacy through the Citizens Committee — including public statements, newspaper letters, and legislative testimony — without threatening discharge, given that Engineer A had not disclosed confidential employer information and had not named specific companies." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer B, the supervisor of Engineer A, warned him that if he continued in his activities, he would be discharged because he was putting his employer in an embarrassing position" ;
proeth:temporalscope "Throughout Engineer A's Citizens Committee activities and at the time of Engineer B's discharge warning" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer B, the supervisor of Engineer A, warned him that if he continued in his activities, he would be discharged because he was putting his employer in an embarrassing position",
"even though Engineer A had not mentioned the products of his employer or any other specific company in his activities on behalf of the Citizens Committee" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 82 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T13:59:43.310040"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 82 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
82
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T13:39:58.179686+00:00
First case
82
Generated
2026-03-02T13:39:58.179686+00:00
Attributed to
Case 82 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T13:59:43.310040
Generated by
ProEthica Case 82 Extraction