DP4
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/82#DP4
Properties
Instance of
Decision Point Id
DP4
Decision question
Should Engineer A continue his Citizens Committee advocacy after receiving Engineer B's discharge threat, accepting the risk of termination, or should he cease the advocacy to protect his employment at XYZ Manufacturing?
Focus
Engineer A, having received Engineer B's discharge threat, must decide whether to continue his Citizens Committee advocacy — accepting the personal employment risk as the cost of fulfilling his professional civic obligations — or to cease the advocacy to preserve his employment, given that the Board has not yet ruled and he cannot be certain his conduct will be validated.
Option1
Proceed with Citizens Committee activities — including public statements, media letters, and legislative testimony — despite Engineer B's discharge threat, treating the personal employment risk as the recognized cost of fulfilling the professional civic obligation the Code imposes.
Option2
Temporarily suspend Citizens Committee activities and seek a formal ethics opinion from NSPE or a state engineering board before continuing, thereby preserving employment while pursuing a ruling that could provide professional validation and reduce the personal risk of continued advocacy.
Option3
Discontinue Citizens Committee activities in response to Engineer B's discharge threat, prioritizing employment security and the faithful agent obligation to XYZ Manufacturing over the civic advocacy role, on the grounds that the Code does not require engineers to sacrifice their livelihood for non-safety-critical public welfare concerns.
Role
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix case82: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/82#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case82:DP4 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP4" ;
proeth:decisionPointId "DP4" ;
proeth:decisionQuestion "Should Engineer A continue his Citizens Committee advocacy after receiving Engineer B's discharge threat, accepting the risk of termination, or should he cease the advocacy to protect his employment at XYZ Manufacturing?" ;
proeth:focus "Engineer A, having received Engineer B's discharge threat, must decide whether to continue his Citizens Committee advocacy — accepting the personal employment risk as the cost of fulfilling his professional civic obligations — or to cease the advocacy to preserve his employment, given that the Board has not yet ruled and he cannot be certain his conduct will be validated." ;
proeth:option1 "Proceed with Citizens Committee activities — including public statements, media letters, and legislative testimony — despite Engineer B's discharge threat, treating the personal employment risk as the recognized cost of fulfilling the professional civic obligation the Code imposes." ;
proeth:option2 "Temporarily suspend Citizens Committee activities and seek a formal ethics opinion from NSPE or a state engineering board before continuing, thereby preserving employment while pursuing a ruling that could provide professional validation and reduce the personal risk of continued advocacy." ;
proeth:option3 "Discontinue Citizens Committee activities in response to Engineer B's discharge threat, prioritizing employment security and the faithful agent obligation to XYZ Manufacturing over the civic advocacy role, on the grounds that the Code does not require engineers to sacrifice their livelihood for non-safety-critical public welfare concerns." ;
proeth:roleLabel "Engineer A" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T14:12:26.318662"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 82 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Generated
2026-03-02T14:12:26.318662
Generated by
ProEthica Case 82 Extraction