DP5
Individual
30aebea5
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#DP5
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP5
Decision Question
After resuming work and qualitatively confirming the stormwater runoff risk to the community's drinking water source, should Engineer L formally notify Client X of the confirmed risk and withdraw from the project if Client X refuses to invest in the protective measures identified as necessary?
Focus
Engineer L's obligation to notify Client X of the confirmed stormwater runoff risk after resuming work and completing additional studies, and whether that post-resumption disclosure — combined with Client X's refusal to fund protective measures — requires Engineer L to withdraw from the project.
Option1
Formally notify Client X of the confirmed risk, withdraw from the project upon Client X's refusal to fund protective measures, notify local environmental regulatory authorities of the unmitigated risk, and disclose confirmed findings to any successor engineer
Option2
Formally notify Client X of the confirmed risk and continue working on the project while advocating internally for protective measures, on the basis that continued engagement preserves Engineer L's influence over the design
Role Label
Engineer L
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_8: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#DP5> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP5" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
30aebea5a10cc2c8...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-24T02:55:02.901771
Generated By
ProEthica Case 8 Extraction