DP2
Individual
8de5f8e9
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#DP2
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP2
Decision Question
Would it be ethical for Engineer L to continue working on Client X's project when Client X refuses to invest in the protective measures identified by Engineer L as necessary to protect the community's primary drinking water source?
Focus
Engineer L's obligation to withdraw from the project and refuse continued work after Client X explicitly refuses to implement the protective measures Engineer L identified as necessary to protect the community drinking water watershed, following qualitative confirmation of stormwater runoff risk during Phase 2.
Option1
Withdraw from the project and refuse to continue design work until Client X commits to implementing the protective measures identified as necessary to protect the community drinking water watershed
Option2
Continue working on the project while formally objecting to Client X's refusal and continuing to advocate internally for implementation of the identified protective measures
Role Label
Engineer L
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_8: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#DP2> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP2" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
8de5f8e9fa1ba744...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-24T02:55:02.896969
Generated By
ProEthica Case 8 Extraction