Engineer A Building Inspection Director Structural Adequacy Escalation

O · Obligation Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/79#Engineer_A_Building_Inspection_Director_Structural_Adequacy_Escalation
Properties
Instance of
BuildingInspectionProgramStructuralAdequacyEscalationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#BuildingInspectionProgramStructuralAdequacyEscalationObligation
Case context
Engineer A's building inspection program required inspectors to perform up to 60 inspections per day, making adequate inspection under the newer code requirements structurally impossible.
Compliance status
partial
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A (Director of City Building Department)
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to escalate the structural inadequacy of the building inspection program — requiring up to 60 inspections per day per inspector under newer, more rigorous code requirements — through appropriate institutional channels, including formal written notification to city administration and city council, rather than acquiescing in the inadequacy or trading concurrence with safety-compromising measures for administrative relief.
Temporal scope
Upon recognizing the structural inadequacy of the inspection program
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A is faced with a predicament with a variety of options and alternatives

Text references
Engineer A is faced with a predicament with a variety of options and alternatives
the obligation is often clear and obvious, in other instances, there could be an obligation on the part of the engineer to balance competing or concurrent obligations
TTL
@prefix case79: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/79#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case79:Engineer_A_Building_Inspection_Director_Structural_Adequacy_Escalation a proeth:BuildingInspectionProgramStructuralAdequacyEscalationObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Building Inspection Director Structural Adequacy Escalation" ; proeth-core:competesWith case79:Engineer_A_Building_Inspection_Director_Quid_Pro_Quo_Non-Acceptance ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case79:Building_Department_Inspection_Resource_Constraint ; proeth:casecontext "Engineer A's building inspection program required inspectors to perform up to 60 inspections per day, making adequate inspection under the newer code requirements structurally impossible." ; proeth:compliancestatus "partial" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.9" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case79:Systemic_Failure_Escalation_Obligation_Triggered_For_Engineer_A_Building_Program ; proeth:discoveredincase "79" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T07:06:46.613281+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "79" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T07:06:46.613281+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (Director of City Building Department)" ; proeth:obligationclass "Building Inspection Program Structural Adequacy Escalation Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to escalate the structural inadequacy of the building inspection program — requiring up to 60 inspections per day per inspector under newer, more rigorous code requirements — through appropriate institutional channels, including formal written notification to city administration and city council, rather than acquiescing in the inadequacy or trading concurrence with safety-compromising measures for administrative relief." ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A is faced with a predicament with a variety of options and alternatives" ; proeth:temporalscope "Upon recognizing the structural inadequacy of the inspection program" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A is faced with a predicament with a variety of options and alternatives", "the obligation is often clear and obvious, in other instances, there could be an obligation on the part of the engineer to balance competing or concurrent obligations" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 79 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T07:16:01.184384"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 79 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
79
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T07:06:46.613281+00:00
First case
79
Generated
2026-03-01T07:06:46.613281+00:00
Attributed to
Case 79 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T07:16:01.184384
Generated by
ProEthica Case 79 Extraction