Engineer-Public-Safety-Escalation-Standard
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/79#Engineer-Public-Safety-Escalation-Standard
Properties
Instance of
EngineerPublicSafetyEscalationStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineerPublicSafetyEscalationStandard
Confidence
0.87
Created by
Professional engineering ethics bodies
Document title
Engineer Public Safety Escalation Standard
Importance
high
Used by
Engineer A in deciding whether and how to address the inspection adequacy crisis
Used in context
Governs Engineer A's duty to escalate the public safety risk created by inadequate building inspections (60 per day per inspector) and to resist or refuse concurrence with measures that would further reduce public safety protections, even when the immediate employer (city) is the source of the problem.
Version
Current
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A has been concerned that as a result of a series of budget cutbacks and more rigid code enforcement requirements, the city has been unable to provide a sufficient number of qualified individuals to perform adequate and timely building inspections
Text references
Engineer A has been concerned that as a result of a series of budget cutbacks and more rigid code enforcement requirements, the city has been unable to provide a sufficient number of qualified individuals to perform adequate and timely building inspections
Engineer A meets with the chairman of the local city council to discuss his concerns
TTL
@prefix case79: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/79#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case79:Engineer-Public-Safety-Escalation-Standard a proeth:EngineerPublicSafetyEscalationStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer-Public-Safety-Escalation-Standard" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.87" ;
proeth:createdby "Professional engineering ethics bodies" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "79" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Engineer Public Safety Escalation Standard" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T06:51:14.716356+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "79" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T06:51:14.716356+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Engineer Public Safety Escalation Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A has been concerned that as a result of a series of budget cutbacks and more rigid code enforcement requirements, the city has been unable to provide a sufficient number of qualified individuals to perform adequate and timely building inspections" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A has been concerned that as a result of a series of budget cutbacks and more rigid code enforcement requirements, the city has been unable to provide a sufficient number of qualified individuals to perform adequate and timely building inspections",
"Engineer A meets with the chairman of the local city council to discuss his concerns" ;
proeth:usedby "Engineer A in deciding whether and how to address the inspection adequacy crisis" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Governs Engineer A's duty to escalate the public safety risk created by inadequate building inspections (60 per day per inspector) and to resist or refuse concurrence with measures that would further reduce public safety protections, even when the immediate employer (city) is the source of the problem." ;
proeth:version "Current" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 79 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T07:16:01.166780"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 79 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
79
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T06:51:14.716356+00:00
First case
79
Generated
2026-03-01T06:51:14.716356+00:00
Attributed to
Case 79 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T07:16:01.166780
Generated by
ProEthica Case 79 Extraction