Code Officials Competing Thoroughness vs. Cost Duty
Individual
2e723b50
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/79#Code_Officials_Competing_Thoroughness_vs._Cost_Duty
Properties
Parent
Activeperiod
Ongoing throughout the case while workload remains at 60 inspections per day
Affectedparties
Building permit applicants
City administration
Code officials
Engineer A
Concept Category
State
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Stateclass
Competing Duties State
Subject
Code officials' simultaneous obligations to perform thorough inspections and to meet city cost-containment and revenue goals
Terminatedby
Resolution of resource constraint or policy change reducing inspection quotas
Triggeringevent
City's imposition of high inspection quotas alongside newer, more demanding code requirements
Urgencylevel
medium
Source Evidence
Source Text
The code officials are caught between the responsibility to be thorough in their inspections and the city's desire to hold down costs and generate revenue from inspection fees
Text References
The code officials are caught between the responsibility to be thorough in their inspections and the city's desire to hold down costs and generate revenue from inspection fees
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_79: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/79> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/79#Code_Officials_Competing_Thoroughness_vs._Cost_Duty> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Code Officials Competing Thoroughness vs. Cost Duty" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CompetingDutiesState> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
2e723b5030c8294f...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
79
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-01T06:51:04.283850+00:00
First Case
79
Generated
2026-03-01T06:51:04.283850+00:00
Attributed To
Case 79 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T07:16:01.165216
Generated By
ProEthica Case 79 Extraction