Building-Code-Inspection-Adequacy-Standard

Individual 08c6a697
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/79#Building-Code-Inspection-Adequacy-Standard
Properties
Parent
BuildingCodeInspectionAdequacyStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#BuildingCodeInspectionAdequacyStandard
Concept Category
Resource
Confidence
0.82
Createdby
Building code enforcement professional bodies, municipal engineering practice norms
Documenttitle
Building Code Inspection Adequacy Standard
Importance
high
Resourceclass
Building Code Inspection Adequacy Standard
Usedby
Engineer A in assessing the adequacy of current inspection staffing and workload
Usedincontext
Provides the professional benchmark against which Engineer A evaluates whether 60 inspections per day is adequate, and grounds the ethical judgment that the current inspection workload is professionally insufficient to protect public health and safety under the newer code requirements.
Version
Current professional practice norms
Source Evidence
Source Text
Each code official member of Engineer A's staff is often required to make as many as 60 code inspections per day

Text References
Each code official member of Engineer A's staff is often required to make as many as 60 code inspections per day
Engineer A believes that there is no way even the most conscientious code official can make 60 adequate, much less thorough, inspections in one day, particularly under the newer, more rigid code requirements for the city
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proethica_case_79: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/79> . <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/79#Building-Code-Inspection-Adequacy-Standard> a owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Building-Code-Inspection-Adequacy-Standard" ; rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#BuildingCodeInspectionAdequacyStandard> .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Content Hash
08c6a6978419d10d...
Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
79
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-01T06:51:14.716356+00:00
First Case
79
Generated
2026-03-01T06:51:14.716356+00:00
Attributed To
Case 79 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T07:16:01.167494
Generated By
ProEthica Case 79 Extraction