Faithful Agent Obligation Within Ethical Limits Engineer A Current Case Insurance Company
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/78#Faithful_Agent_Obligation_Within_Ethical_Limits_Engineer_A_Current_Case_Insurance_Company
Properties
Instance of
Case context
Engineer A retained by insurance company to forensically investigate arson-damaged beam; completed investigation and submitted written report; State Board found this sufficient; BER found NSPE Code required more
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.88
Importance
medium
Obligated party
Engineer A (current case subdivision forensic engineer)
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to fulfill his faithful agent duty to the insurance company by completing the contracted forensic investigation and submitting a written report of his findings, while recognizing that this faithful agent duty did not exhaust his broader ethical obligations to the public.
Temporal scope
Throughout the forensic engagement with the insurance company
Relationships
competesWith
Confidentiality Non-Override Public Danger Engineer A Current Case Insurance Client, Ethics Code Higher Standard Non-Reliance Engineer A Insurance Report Current Case, Incidental Observation Safety Disclosure Engineer A Current Case Subdivision Beam, Proportional Escalation Calibrated Risk Current Case Between BER 00-5 and 07-10, Systemic Tract Defect Multi-Party Notification Engineer A Current Case Subdivision
Source Evidence
Source text
the State Board of Professional Engineers determined that 'Engineer A had fulfilled his professional obligation by notifying the insurance company, in writing, of the defect'
Text references
Engineer A had an obligation to go further.
the State Board of Professional Engineers determined that 'Engineer A had fulfilled his professional obligation by notifying the insurance company, in writing, of the defect'
TTL
@prefix case78: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/78#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case78:Faithful_Agent_Obligation_Within_Ethical_Limits_Engineer_A_Current_Case_Insurance_Company a proeth:FaithfulAgentObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Faithful Agent Obligation Within Ethical Limits Engineer A Current Case Insurance Company" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case78:Confidentiality_Non-Override_Public_Danger_Engineer_A_Current_Case_Insurance_Client,
case78:Ethics_Code_Higher_Standard_Non-Reliance_Engineer_A_Insurance_Report_Current_Case,
case78:Incidental_Observation_Safety_Disclosure_Engineer_A_Current_Case_Subdivision_Beam,
case78:Proportional_Escalation_Calibrated_Risk_Current_Case_Between_BER_00-5_and_07-10,
case78:Systemic_Tract_Defect_Multi-Party_Notification_Engineer_A_Current_Case_Subdivision ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/78#Client_Relationship_—_Insurance_Company_Forensic_Engagement>,
case78:Forensic_Arson_Investigation_Scope-Exceeding_Structural_Defect_Discovery,
case78:Public_Safety_Obligation_Beyond_Client_Relationship,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/78#Systemic_Subdivision_Defect_—_Present_Case>,
case78:Systemic_Tract_Home_Subdivision_Design_Defect_Risk ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A retained by insurance company to forensically investigate arson-damaged beam; completed investigation and submitted written report; State Board found this sufficient; BER found NSPE Code required more" ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case78:Faithful_Agent_Obligation_Within_Ethical_Limits_Invoked_by_Engineer_A_Insurance_Client_Service ;
proeth:discoveredincase "78" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T05:10:50.405638+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "78" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T05:10:50.405638+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (current case subdivision forensic engineer)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Faithful Agent Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to fulfill his faithful agent duty to the insurance company by completing the contracted forensic investigation and submitting a written report of his findings, while recognizing that this faithful agent duty did not exhaust his broader ethical obligations to the public." ;
proeth:sourcetext "the State Board of Professional Engineers determined that 'Engineer A had fulfilled his professional obligation by notifying the insurance company, in writing, of the defect'" ;
proeth:temporalscope "Throughout the forensic engagement with the insurance company" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A had an obligation to go further.",
"the State Board of Professional Engineers determined that 'Engineer A had fulfilled his professional obligation by notifying the insurance company, in writing, of the defect'" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 78 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T05:38:29.586444"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 78 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
78
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T05:10:50.405638+00:00
First case
78
Generated
2026-02-27T05:10:50.405638+00:00
Attributed to
Case 78 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T05:38:29.586444
Generated by
ProEthica Case 78 Extraction