DP1
Individual
0eab908d
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/78#DP1
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP1
Decision Question
Having submitted a written report to the insurance company documenting a seriously under-designed beam likely replicated across an entire subdivision of occupied tract homes, what further escalation steps — if any — does Engineer A's ethical obligation under the NSPE Code require?
Focus
Engineer A's obligation to escalate disclosure of the systemic subdivision structural defect beyond the written report submitted to the retaining insurance company — calibrated to the intermediate risk profile of a non-imminent but potentially widespread danger affecting multiple occupied tract homes.
Option1
Contact local building officials and the homeowners or community civic association directly to advise them of the systemic structural defect findings, in addition to the written report already submitted to the insurance company
Option2
Rely on the written report to the insurance company as the primary disclosure vehicle, on the grounds that the insurance company — as a sophisticated institutional actor with financial exposure — has both the incentive and the capacity to transmit the safety finding to building officials and affected homeowners without Engineer A's direct intervention
Option3
Contact local building officials only — without separately notifying the homeowners association — treating regulatory authority notification as sufficient escalation for a non-imminent structural risk while preserving client confidentiality with respect to the homeowners as a non-party group
Role Label
Engineer A BER 07-10 Post-Sale Safety Notifying Engineer
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_78: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/78> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/78#DP1> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP1" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
0eab908d5cfda00c...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-27T05:51:37.120162
Generated By
ProEthica Case 78 Extraction