Contractor Reuse Decision Creating Unresolved Structural Risk
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/78#Contractor_Reuse_Decision_Creating_Unresolved_Structural_Risk
Properties
Instance of
ConfirmedRiskWithoutAdequateSafeguardsState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ConfirmedRiskWithoutAdequateSafeguardsState
Active period
From Engineer A's confirmation of serious under-design through the end of the case facts; contractor's reuse decision is not reversed within the case
Affected parties
Construction contractor
Engineer A
Future occupants of the residence
Insurance company
Confidence
0.82
Importance
high
Subject
Construction contractor's determination that the seriously under-designed beam could be reused, despite Engineer A's subsequent finding of serious under-design
Terminated by
Not terminated within the case facts
Triggering event
Engineer A's structural calculations confirm serious under-design of a beam the contractor has already decided to reuse on the project
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A learns that the construction contractor determined that the beam could be reused on the project
Text references
Engineer A determines that the beam was seriously under-designed
Engineer A learns that the construction contractor determined that the beam could be reused on the project
TTL
@prefix case78: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/78#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case78:Contractor_Reuse_Decision_Creating_Unresolved_Structural_Risk a proeth:ConfirmedRiskWithoutAdequateSafeguardsState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Contractor Reuse Decision Creating Unresolved Structural Risk" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From Engineer A's confirmation of serious under-design through the end of the case facts; contractor's reuse decision is not reversed within the case" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Construction contractor",
"Engineer A",
"Future occupants of the residence",
"Insurance company" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.82" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "78" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T04:51:35.554670+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "78" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T04:51:35.554670+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A learns that the construction contractor determined that the beam could be reused on the project" ;
proeth:stateclass "Confirmed Risk Without Adequate Safeguards State" ;
proeth:subject "Construction contractor's determination that the seriously under-designed beam could be reused, despite Engineer A's subsequent finding of serious under-design" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Not terminated within the case facts" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A determines that the beam was seriously under-designed",
"Engineer A learns that the construction contractor determined that the beam could be reused on the project" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A's structural calculations confirm serious under-design of a beam the contractor has already decided to reuse on the project" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 78 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T05:38:29.572311"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 78 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
78
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-27T04:51:35.554670+00:00
First case
78
Generated
2026-02-27T04:51:35.554670+00:00
Attributed to
Case 78 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T05:38:29.572311
Generated by
ProEthica Case 78 Extraction