Construction Contractor Reuse Decision Maker Individual
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/78#Construction_Contractor_Reuse_Decision_Maker_Individual
Definition
Construction contractor on the arson-damaged residence who determined, without independent structural engineering verification, that the fire-damaged beam could be reused in the ongoing construction project; this decision is what Engineer A's forensic investigation was partly responding to.
Properties
Instance of
ConstructionContractorReuseDecisionMaker
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ConstructionContractorReuseDecisionMaker
Attributes
| entity_type | Construction contractor |
| decision | Beam can be reused despite fire damage |
Confidence
0.8
Importance
medium
Relationships
| type | decision_reviewed_by |
| target | Engineer A Subdivision Tract Defect Reporting Forensic Engineer |
Role category
participant
Source Evidence
Source text
the construction contractor determined that the beam could be reused on the project
Text references
the construction contractor determined that the beam could be reused on the project
TTL
@prefix case78: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/78#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case78:Construction_Contractor_Reuse_Decision_Maker_Individual a proeth:ConstructionContractorReuseDecisionMaker,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Construction Contractor Reuse Decision Maker Individual" ;
proeth:attributes "{'entity_type': 'Construction contractor', 'decision': 'Beam can be reused despite fire damage'}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "Construction contractor on the arson-damaged residence who determined, without independent structural engineering verification, that the fire-damaged beam could be reused in the ongoing construction project; this decision is what Engineer A's forensic investigation was partly responding to." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.8" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "78" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T04:51:12.507457+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "78" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T04:51:12.507457+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'decision_reviewed_by', 'target': 'Engineer A Subdivision Tract Defect Reporting Forensic Engineer'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "participant" ;
proeth:roleclass "Construction Contractor Reuse Decision Maker" ;
proeth:sourcetext "the construction contractor determined that the beam could be reused on the project" ;
proeth:textreferences "the construction contractor determined that the beam could be reused on the project" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 78 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T05:38:29.570832"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 78 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
78
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-27T04:51:12.507457+00:00
First case
78
Generated
2026-02-27T04:51:12.507457+00:00
Attributed to
Case 78 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T05:38:29.570832
Generated by
ProEthica Case 78 Extraction