DP4

@prefix case76: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/76#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . case76:DP4 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "DP4" ; proeth:decisionPointId "DP4" ; proeth:decisionQuestion "Should Engineers A and B continue to actively pursue the matter with regulatory authorities and other appropriate parties until the public health risk is genuinely resolved, rather than treating a single formal notification as sufficient?" ; proeth:focus "Having notified the state regulatory authority, Engineers A and B must decide whether to continue actively pursuing the matter until the public health threat is genuinely resolved, or whether a single formal notification satisfies their professional obligations. The commission has proceeded with the project, and there is no guarantee that the regulatory agency will act swiftly or decisively. Continued pursuit requires sustained effort that may prolong conflict with the client and expose the engineers to professional and legal risk." ; proeth:option1 "Continue engaging with the state regulatory agency and any other appropriate authorities, providing additional technical support, follow-up presentations, and documentation as needed until the lead leaching risk is definitively addressed and the public is protected." ; proeth:option2 "Consider the professional obligation fulfilled upon submission of the formal regulatory notification and take no further action, leaving resolution entirely to the regulatory agency and the commission." ; proeth:roleLabel "Engineers A and B" ; prov:wasAttributedTo "claude-sonnet-4-6" ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 76 Extraction" .