Completeness Non-Selectivity Advisory Opinion Invoked By Engineer A Board Report
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/73#Completeness_Non-Selectivity_Advisory_Opinion_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_Board_Report
Properties
Instance of
CompletenessandNon-SelectivityinProfessionalAdvisoryOpinions
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CompletenessandNon-SelectivityinProfessionalAdvisoryOpinions
Applied to
Board report on solar panel replacement decision
Organizational Board Energy Decision Authority
Balancing with
Carbon Footprint Reduction Stakeholder preferences
Client Loyalty
Concrete expression
Engineer A must present the board with a complete technical picture that includes both the normal-condition viability of the solar project and the rolling blackout risk, rather than selectively presenting only the information that satisfies carbon footprint reduction stakeholders.
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Interpretation
The board is a non-engineer decision-making body that lacks independent capacity to evaluate the completeness of Engineer A's analysis; Engineer A must therefore ensure the report is complete and not filtered to favor the stakeholder-preferred outcome.
Invoked by
Engineer A Energy Systems Reporting Engineer
Tension resolution
Completeness obligation requires Engineer A to include the rolling blackout risk even though doing so may complicate the board's decision and disappoint carbon footprint reduction stakeholders.
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A is convinced that the solar project, when considered in isolation, is viable and will satisfy those stakeholders interested in reducing the organization's carbon footprint.
Text references
Engineer A also realizes that a move to solar production without storage may stress the local utility generation mix even more, increasing the likelihood of rolling blackouts.
Engineer A is convinced that the solar project, when considered in isolation, is viable and will satisfy those stakeholders interested in reducing the organization's carbon footprint.
Engineer A is preparing a report that will be presented to the board to consider the new solar project.
TTL
@prefix case73: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/73#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case73:Completeness_Non-Selectivity_Advisory_Opinion_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_Board_Report a proeth:CompletenessandNon-SelectivityinProfessionalAdvisoryOpinions,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Completeness Non-Selectivity Advisory Opinion Invoked By Engineer A Board Report" ;
proeth:appliedto "Board report on solar panel replacement decision",
"Organizational Board Energy Decision Authority" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Carbon Footprint Reduction Stakeholder preferences",
"Client Loyalty" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "Engineer A must present the board with a complete technical picture that includes both the normal-condition viability of the solar project and the rolling blackout risk, rather than selectively presenting only the information that satisfies carbon footprint reduction stakeholders." ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "73" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T23:35:16.556086+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "73" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T23:35:16.556086+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "The board is a non-engineer decision-making body that lacks independent capacity to evaluate the completeness of Engineer A's analysis; Engineer A must therefore ensure the report is complete and not filtered to favor the stakeholder-preferred outcome." ;
proeth:invokedby "Engineer A Energy Systems Reporting Engineer" ;
proeth:principleclass "Completeness and Non-Selectivity in Professional Advisory Opinions" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A is convinced that the solar project, when considered in isolation, is viable and will satisfy those stakeholders interested in reducing the organization's carbon footprint." ;
proeth:tensionresolution "Completeness obligation requires Engineer A to include the rolling blackout risk even though doing so may complicate the board's decision and disappoint carbon footprint reduction stakeholders." ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A also realizes that a move to solar production without storage may stress the local utility generation mix even more, increasing the likelihood of rolling blackouts.",
"Engineer A is convinced that the solar project, when considered in isolation, is viable and will satisfy those stakeholders interested in reducing the organization's carbon footprint.",
"Engineer A is preparing a report that will be presented to the board to consider the new solar project." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 73 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T23:54:19.975007"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 73 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
73
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-25T23:35:16.556086+00:00
First case
73
Generated
2026-02-25T23:35:16.556086+00:00
Attributed to
Case 73 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T23:54:19.975007
Generated by
ProEthica Case 73 Extraction