Engineer B Pile Foundation Test Report
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/71#Engineer_B_Pile_Foundation_Test_Report
Definition
Engineer B's report was the primary technical artifact at issue in the dispute, concluding that 19 of 90 piles did not meet the required safety factor. The report omitted findings about driving to essential refusal and the failure of dynamic test equipment, raising questions about completeness and objectivity.
Properties
Instance of
GeotechnicalTestReportResource
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#GeotechnicalTestReportResource
Confidence
0.88
Created by
Engineer B
Document title
Engineer B Report on Test Pile Driving and Pile Capacity Evaluation
Used by
Engineer B
Used in context
Engineer B's report was the primary technical artifact at issue in the dispute, concluding that 19 of 90 piles did not meet the required safety factor. The report omitted findings about driving to essential refusal and the failure of dynamic test equipment, raising questions about completeness and objectivity.
Match Confidence
0.0
Matches Existing
false
Synthesis Literal
confidence
createdBy
documentTitle
resourceClass
textReferences
usedInContext
Relationships
availableTo
Agent Engineer B
Source Evidence
Text references
Additionally, Engineer B did not report that the dynamic test equipment had failed.
Engineer B did not state anywhere in the report that these 19 piles, according to the pile driving records, had been driven to essential refusal
Engineer B's concluding report stated that approximately 19 of the 90 piles did not meet the safety factor required by the design calculations.
Source text
Engineer B's concluding report stated that approximately 19 of the 90 piles did not meet the safety factor required by the design calculations.
TTL
@prefix case71: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/71#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case71:Engineer_B_Pile_Foundation_Test_Report a proeth:GeotechnicalTestReportResource,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Pile Foundation Test Report" ;
proeth-core:availableTo case71:Agent_Engineer_B ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:createdBy "Engineer B" ;
proeth:documentTitle "Engineer B Report on Test Pile Driving and Pile Capacity Evaluation" ;
proeth:resourceClass "Geotechnical Test Report Resource" ;
proeth:textReferences "Additionally, Engineer B did not report that the dynamic test equipment had failed.",
"Engineer B did not state anywhere in the report that these 19 piles, according to the pile driving records, had been driven to essential refusal",
"Engineer B's concluding report stated that approximately 19 of the 90 piles did not meet the safety factor required by the design calculations." ;
proeth:usedBy "Engineer B" ;
proeth:usedInContext "Engineer B's report was the primary technical artifact at issue in the dispute, concluding that 19 of 90 piles did not meet the required safety factor. The report omitted findings about driving to essential refusal and the failure of dynamic test equipment, raising questions about completeness and objectivity." ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 71 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 1 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T14:26:23.227248+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 71 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "Engineer B's concluding report stated that approximately 19 of the 90 piles did not meet the safety factor required by the design calculations." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "confidence",
"createdBy",
"documentTitle",
"resourceClass",
"textReferences",
"usedInContext" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer B's report was the primary technical artifact at issue in the dispute, concluding that 19 of 90 piles did not meet the required safety factor. The report omitted findings about driving to essential refusal and the failure of dynamic test equipment, raising questions about completeness and objectivity." ;
skos:definition "Engineer B's report was the primary technical artifact at issue in the dispute, concluding that 19 of 90 piles did not meet the required safety factor. The report omitted findings about driving to essential refusal and the failure of dynamic test equipment, raising questions about completeness and objectivity." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T14:26:23.227248+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 71 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 71 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
71
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-06-04T14:26:23.227248+00:00
First case
71
Generated
2026-06-04T14:26:23.227248+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 71 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 71 Extraction