Conflicting-Expert-Report-Standard-Pile-Case

Individual ebd66148
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/71#Conflicting-Expert-Report-Standard-Pile-Case
Properties
Parent
ConflictingExpertReportStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ConflictingExpertReportStandard
Concept Category
Resource
Confidence
0.91
Createdby
Professional engineering ethics consensus
Documenttitle
Professional norms governing ethical obligations when expert reports contradict prior engineering findings
Importance
high
Resourceclass
Conflicting Expert Report Standard
Usedby
Engineer B (as retained expert for municipality); Engineer A (as subject of the contradicting report)
Usedincontext
Governs the ethical obligations of Engineer B as a subsequent expert whose report contradicted Engineer A's design and the pile driving records, including the obligation to engage with contrary evidence rather than dismissing it without investigation
Source Evidence
Source Text
Engineer B said: 'We just did not believe the driving records'

Text References
Engineer B said: 'We just did not believe the driving records'
Previously, Engineer B had said, 'We didn't look at the pile driving records because it was not in our scope of work.'
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proethica_case_71: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/71> . <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/71#Conflicting-Expert-Report-Standard-Pile-Case> a owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Conflicting-Expert-Report-Standard-Pile-Case" ; rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ConflictingExpertReportStandard> .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Content Hash
ebd661480431f1b9...
Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
71
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-02-26T11:12:38.004872+00:00
First Case
71
Generated
2026-02-26T11:12:38.004872+00:00
Attributed To
Case 71 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-26T11:37:51.632497
Generated By
ProEthica Case 71 Extraction