Engineer A Report AI Disclosure
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#Engineer_A_Report_AI_Disclosure
Definition
Engineer A was obligated to proactively disclose to Client W that AI language processing software substantially contributed to the contaminant report.
Properties
Instance of
AIContributionDisclosureObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#AIContributionDisclosureObligation
Case context
Engineer A used open-source AI software to generate the initial draft of the contaminant report but did not disclose this to Client W when submitting the final report.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.89
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to proactively disclose to Client W that AI language processing software substantially contributed to the contaminant report.
Temporal scope
At the time of delivering the contaminant report to Client W
Match Confidence
0.88
Match Reasoning
Via class 'AI Contribution Disclosure Obligation': This obligation is substantively the same concept as the already-extracted AI Tool Disclosure Obligation. The present class emphasizes the proactive and best-practice dimension but covers the same duty to disclose AI contribution to clients and stakeholders.
Matched Ontology Label
AI Tool Disclosure Obligation
Matches Existing
true
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
complianceStatus
confidence
obligationClass
obligationStatement
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
obligatedParty
Agent Engineer A
derivedFromPrinciple
Engineer A AI Disclosure Transparency
Source Evidence
Text references
BER Case 98-3 emphasized that engineers must acknowledge significant contributions by others. AI, while not a human contributor, fundamentally shaped the report and design documents, warranting disclosure under Code section III.9.
While Engineer A reviewed the content, the lack of disclosure raises concerns about transparency.
Source text
While Engineer A reviewed the content, the lack of disclosure raises concerns about transparency.
TTL
@prefix case7: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case7:Engineer_A_Report_AI_Disclosure a proeth:AIContributionDisclosureObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Report AI Disclosure" ;
proeth-core:obligatedParty case7:Agent_Engineer_A ;
proeth:caseContext "Engineer A used open-source AI software to generate the initial draft of the contaminant report but did not disclose this to Client W when submitting the final report." ;
proeth:complianceStatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.89" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case7:Engineer_A_AI_Disclosure_Transparency ;
proeth:obligatedParty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationClass "AI Contribution Disclosure Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationStatement "Engineer A was obligated to proactively disclose to Client W that AI language processing software substantially contributed to the contaminant report." ;
proeth:temporalScope "At the time of delivering the contaminant report to Client W" ;
proeth:textReferences "BER Case 98-3 emphasized that engineers must acknowledge significant contributions by others. AI, while not a human contributor, fundamentally shaped the report and design documents, warranting disclosure under Code section III.9.",
"While Engineer A reviewed the content, the lack of disclosure raises concerns about transparency." ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 7 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-03T14:09:34.826300+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 7 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.88 ;
proeth-prov:matchReasoning "Via class 'AI Contribution Disclosure Obligation': This obligation is substantively the same concept as the already-extracted AI Tool Disclosure Obligation. The present class emphasizes the proactive and best-practice dimension but covers the same duty to disclose AI contribution to clients and stakeholders." ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass proeth:AIToolDisclosureObligation ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "AI Tool Disclosure Obligation" ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "While Engineer A reviewed the content, the lack of disclosure raises concerns about transparency." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext",
"complianceStatus",
"confidence",
"obligationClass",
"obligationStatement",
"temporalScope",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer A was obligated to proactively disclose to Client W that AI language processing software substantially contributed to the contaminant report." ;
skos:definition "Engineer A was obligated to proactively disclose to Client W that AI language processing software substantially contributed to the contaminant report." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-03T14:09:34.826300+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 7 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 7 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
7
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-06-03T14:09:34.826300+00:00
First case
7
Generated
2026-06-03T14:09:34.826300+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 7 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 7 Extraction