DP8
Individual
f689334d
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP8
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP8
Decision Question
Should Engineer A fulfill the Proactive AI Disclosure to Client Obligation by disclosing the use of AI tools to Client W — particularly at the moment Client W directly observed that the report appeared to have been written by two different authors — or does silence in that moment constitute a deceptive act under Code provisions I.5 and III.3?
Focus
Engineer A: Proactive AI Disclosure to Client Obligation and Duty of Candor When Client W Identifies Stylistic Anomaly in AI-Generated Report
Option1
Proactively disclose AI tool usage and identify AI-generated sections to Client W — particularly upon Client W's direct observation of stylistic inconsistency — and attribute AI generative contributions in both the report and design documents
Option2
Remain silent about AI tool usage when Client W raises the stylistic inconsistency observation, treating AI as an undisclosed internal drafting mechanism equivalent to conventional engineering software
Role Label
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_7: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP8> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP8" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
f689334dd88ec377...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-24T06:49:08.786161
Generated By
ProEthica Case 7 Extraction