DP7
Individual
5bc1d381
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP7
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP7
Decision Question
Should Engineer A fulfill the Intellectual Authorship Integrity Obligation and the AI-Assisted Design Comprehensive Verification Obligation by conducting thorough, proportionate review of AI-generated work products before sealing and submitting them to Client W, given that the report received a thorough review while the design documents received only a cursory high-level check?
Focus
Engineer A: Intellectual Authorship Integrity and AI-Assisted Design Comprehensive Verification Obligations in Report and Design Document Submission
Option1
Conduct rigorous, line-by-line technical verification of all AI-generated work products — proportionate to tool novelty and safety-criticality — before affixing professional seal, and attribute AI generative contributions in the work product
Option2
Apply a high-level cursory review to AI-generated design documents and seal them without attribution, treating AI output as equivalent to conventional engineering software output
Role Label
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_7: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP7> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP7" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
5bc1d38130a122b1...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-24T06:49:08.786065
Generated By
ProEthica Case 7 Extraction