DP6

@prefix case7: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . case7:DP6 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "DP6" ; proeth:decisionPointId "DP6" ; proeth:decisionQuestion "Should Engineer A seal the AI-generated design documents based on the review conducted, or withhold the seal until a more rigorous independent verification of safety compliance and responsible charge is completed?" ; proeth:focus "Engineer A must decide whether to seal design documents that were substantially generated by AI tools without adequate verification of safety compliance and responsible charge, or to withhold the seal until independent verification is complete." ; proeth:option1 "Decline to seal the design documents until a complete independent technical review confirms safety compliance and all required design features are present, accepting schedule delay as necessary to meet responsible charge obligations." ; proeth:option2 "Apply the firm's standard quality assurance review process to the AI-generated design, treating AI output as equivalent to conventionally drafted documents and sealing upon completion of that review, consistent with how other computer-assisted design tools are handled." ; proeth:option3 "Retain an independent reviewer with relevant safety expertise to evaluate the safety-critical portions of the AI-generated design before sealing, while applying standard review to non-safety-critical elements, balancing schedule pressure against the heightened risk of AI-generated safety features." ; proeth:roleLabel "Engineer" ; prov:wasAttributedTo "claude-sonnet-4-6" ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 7 Extraction" .