DP5

@prefix case7: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . case7:DP5 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "DP5" ; proeth:decisionPointId "DP5" ; proeth:decisionQuestion "Should Engineer B require Engineer A to disclose AI authorship of the deliverables to the client, or accept the work as submitted on the basis that Engineer B's review satisfies the professional responsibility?" ; proeth:focus "Engineer B, acting as mentor to Engineer A, must decide whether to require Engineer A to disclose the AI-generated authorship of the report and design to the client, or to allow the work to proceed without that disclosure given that Engineer B reviewed the output." ; proeth:option1 "Direct Engineer A to notify the client of AI tool usage in the design and report before final delivery, and confirm that disclosure has been made before Engineer B provides any further mentorship endorsement of the work." ; proeth:option2 "Conduct an independent technical review of the AI-generated content and, if satisfied with quality and accuracy, allow the deliverables to proceed without requiring separate AI disclosure, on the basis that Engineer B's review establishes professional accountability for the output." ; proeth:option3 "Counsel Engineer A on the professional risks of omitting AI disclosure and recommend disclosure as best practice, but ultimately defer to Engineer A's judgment as the engineer of record rather than mandating a specific course of action." ; proeth:roleLabel "Engineer B Mentor Engineer" ; prov:wasAttributedTo "claude-sonnet-4-6" ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 7 Extraction" .