DP4
Individual
5401745f
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP4
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP4
Decision Question
Did Engineer A have an ethical obligation to proactively disclose the use of AI tools to Client W when submitting AI-generated work products, and did silence in the face of Client W's direct observation about stylistic inconsistency constitute a deceptive act?
Focus
Engineer A: Proactive AI Disclosure and Candor Obligation Toward Client W
Option1
Proactively disclose AI tool usage and AI-generated sections to Client W before or upon submission, and clarify AI's role when Client W raises the stylistic inconsistency observation
Option2
Submit AI-generated work products without disclosure and remain silent when Client W observes the stylistic inconsistency, treating AI as an internal drafting tool equivalent to other engineering software
Role Label
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_7: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP4> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP4" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
5401745f07b1c6bf...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-24T06:49:08.780525
Generated By
ProEthica Case 7 Extraction