DP18
Individual
a9922d8f
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP18
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP18
Decision Question
Should Engineer A have obtained Client W's prior informed consent before uploading confidential site data and groundwater monitoring information to an open-source AI platform, and independently arranged alternative peer review after Engineer B's retirement, rather than proceeding without either safeguard?
Focus
Engineer A: Client Data Confidentiality, AI Tool Disclosure, and Mentorship Succession — Uploading Confidential Client Data to Open-Source AI Without Consent and Failing to Arrange Alternative Peer Review After Engineer B's Retirement
Option1
Obtain Client W's prior informed consent before uploading any confidential site data to the AI platform, investigate the platform's data handling and privacy policies, and arrange alternative qualified peer review to replace Engineer B's oversight function before accepting the engagement
Option2
Upload confidential client data to the open-source AI platform without prior consent and proceed without arranging alternative peer review, relying on the AI tool as a substitute for Engineer B's quality assurance function
Role Label
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_7: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP18> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP18" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
a9922d8f660ed1cf...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-24T06:49:08.787247
Generated By
ProEthica Case 7 Extraction