DP17
Individual
01ab08b6
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP17
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP17
Decision Question
Should Engineer A have assessed their own competence with a novel AI drafting tool — including its capabilities, limitations, and failure modes — before deploying it for safety-critical engineering design documents, or was domain expertise in the subject matter sufficient to satisfy the competence standard for AI-assisted work?
Focus
Engineer A: Competence Obligation and Regulatory Compliance Verification — Deploying a Novel, Unfamiliar AI Drafting Tool Without Sufficient Understanding of Its Capabilities and Failure Modes for Safety-Critical Design Work
Option1
Assess competence with the novel AI tool before deployment, investigate its capabilities and failure modes, and arrange alternative qualified peer review to compensate for the loss of Engineer B's oversight before undertaking the engagement
Option2
Deploy the novel AI drafting tool relying on existing domain expertise in groundwater infrastructure design as sufficient competence, without separately investigating the tool's limitations or arranging alternative peer review
Role Label
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_7: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP17> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP17" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
01ab08b61c06d7ef...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-24T06:49:08.787126
Generated By
ProEthica Case 7 Extraction