DP15
Individual
4ed1c9f8
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP15
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP15
Decision Question
Should Engineer A arrange a functionally equivalent alternative peer review mechanism — and select a confidentiality-compliant AI tool — before undertaking a complex dual-scope engagement after losing the primary quality assurance resource provided by Engineer B, rather than substituting an unfamiliar open-source AI tool for that professional oversight?
Focus
Engineer A: Mentorship Succession and Peer Review Continuity Obligation Breached — Obligation to Arrange Alternative Quality Assurance Before Proceeding With Complex AI-Assisted Engagement, Including Confidentiality-Compliant Tool Selection
Option1
Arrange alternative qualified peer review before accepting the engagement, select a privacy-compliant AI tool with contractual data protection guarantees or obtain Client W's explicit consent before uploading confidential data, and scope the engagement to match verified professional infrastructure
Option2
Proceed with the engagement by substituting an unfamiliar open-source AI tool for Engineer B's peer review function and upload confidential client data to the public platform without obtaining prior consent or investigating its data handling practices
Role Label
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_7: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP15> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP15" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
4ed1c9f8c211f4c6...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-24T06:49:08.786921
Generated By
ProEthica Case 7 Extraction