DP12
Individual
998eb45b
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP12
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP12
Decision Question
Should Engineer B (as the quality assurance anchor for Engineer A's practice) have fulfilled the AI-Generated Work Product Competence Verification Obligation and Regulatory Compliance Verification Obligation by ensuring Engineer A possessed sufficient competence with the AI tool and applied adequate verification rigor before sealing outputs, and does Engineer A's failure to do so — combined with silence when Client W identified stylistic inconsistency — constitute independent ethical violations of candor and competence?
Focus
Engineer B Mentor Engineer: AI-Generated Work Product Competence Verification and Regulatory Compliance Verification Obligations — Conditional Permissibility of AI Tool Use and Disclosure
Option1
Disclose AI tool's generative role to Client W when Client W raises the stylistic inconsistency observation, cite journal articles used to cross-check AI content, and verify all AI-generated design outputs against local regulatory requirements before sealing
Option2
Remain silent about AI's generative role when Client W raises the stylistic inconsistency, omit citations to verification sources, and seal design documents after cursory review without verifying regulatory compliance
Role Label
Engineer B Mentor Engineer
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_7: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP12> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP12" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
998eb45bafac0285...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-24T06:49:08.786604
Generated By
ProEthica Case 7 Extraction