DP11
Individual
f1010d4e
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP11
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP11
Decision Question
Should Engineer B (as the departing mentor) have fulfilled the Mentorship Succession and Peer Review Continuity Obligation by arranging or facilitating alternative peer review mechanisms for Engineer A before retiring, and does Engineer A bear an independent obligation to arrange such alternatives rather than substituting an unfamiliar AI tool for professional oversight?
Focus
Engineer B Mentor Engineer: Mentorship Succession and Peer Review Continuity Obligation — Arranging Alternative Oversight Before Retirement
Option1
Arrange alternative qualified peer review mechanism (qualified colleague, professional review service, or subconsultant) before accepting the dual-scope engagement following Engineer B's retirement
Option2
Proceed with the engagement by substituting a newly released open-source AI tool for Engineer B's expert review without arranging any alternative human oversight mechanism
Role Label
Engineer B Mentor Engineer
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_7: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP11> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP11" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
f1010d4e1490bd35...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-24T06:49:08.786512
Generated By
ProEthica Case 7 Extraction