DP10
Individual
83178533
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP10
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP10
Decision Question
Should Engineer B (as the mentor/quality assurance figure whose retirement precipitated Engineer A's AI over-reliance) have fulfilled the Responsible Charge Active Review Obligation and AI-Generated Work Product Competence Verification Obligation by ensuring continuity of oversight before retiring, and does Engineer A's subsequent cursory review of AI-generated design documents constitute a categorical breach of responsible charge?
Focus
Engineer B Mentor Engineer: Responsible Charge Active Review and AI-Generated Work Product Competence Verification Obligations in Design Document Phase
Option1
Conduct rigorous line-by-line technical review of all AI-generated design documents, verifying each dimension against site survey data and each specification against local regulatory requirements, before affixing professional seal
Option2
Apply cursory high-level review of AI-generated design documents and affix professional seal without verifying regulatory compliance or dimensional accuracy against site-specific requirements
Role Label
Engineer B Mentor Engineer
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_7: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#DP10> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP10" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
83178533bffe9b65...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-24T06:49:08.786394
Generated By
ProEthica Case 7 Extraction