City D Jurisdiction QBS Procurement Laws
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/6#City_D_Jurisdiction_QBS_Procurement_Laws
Properties
Instance of
Qualification-BasedSelectionProcurementLaw
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Qualification-BasedSelectionProcurementLaw
Confidence
0.93
Created by
State legislature and local government of City D's jurisdiction
Document title
State and Local Qualification-Based Selection Procurement Statutes (Jurisdiction of City D)
Importance
high
Used by
Engineer A, Engineer B, City D's Engineer
Used in context
Establishes the legal mandate for RFQ processes in awarding engineering contracts; defines the compliance baseline against which City D's contracting practices with Firm X and Firm Z are evaluated; grounds Engineer A's professional obligation to investigate and report non-compliant contracting
Version
Current
Source Evidence
Source text
City D is in a jurisdiction with strong qualification-based selection (QBS) procurement laws at the state and local levels codified within the state's professional engineering licensure laws
Text references
City D is in a jurisdiction with strong qualification-based selection (QBS) procurement laws at the state and local levels codified within the state's professional engineering licensure laws
Engineer B alleges that City D is exclusively awarding traffic engineering contracts to Firm X and civil engineering contracts to Firm Z without utilizing the request for qualifications (RFQ) process
TTL
@prefix case6: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/6#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case6:City_D_Jurisdiction_QBS_Procurement_Laws a proeth:Qualification-BasedSelectionProcurementLaw,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "City D Jurisdiction QBS Procurement Laws" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.93" ;
proeth:createdby "State legislature and local government of City D's jurisdiction" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "6" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "State and Local Qualification-Based Selection Procurement Statutes (Jurisdiction of City D)" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-24T07:04:56.425673+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "6" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-24T07:04:56.425673+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Qualification-Based Selection Procurement Law" ;
proeth:sourcetext "City D is in a jurisdiction with strong qualification-based selection (QBS) procurement laws at the state and local levels codified within the state's professional engineering licensure laws" ;
proeth:textreferences "City D is in a jurisdiction with strong qualification-based selection (QBS) procurement laws at the state and local levels codified within the state's professional engineering licensure laws",
"Engineer B alleges that City D is exclusively awarding traffic engineering contracts to Firm X and civil engineering contracts to Firm Z without utilizing the request for qualifications (RFQ) process" ;
proeth:usedby "Engineer A, Engineer B, City D's Engineer" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Establishes the legal mandate for RFQ processes in awarding engineering contracts; defines the compliance baseline against which City D's contracting practices with Firm X and Firm Z are evaluated; grounds Engineer A's professional obligation to investigate and report non-compliant contracting" ;
proeth:version "Current" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 6 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-24T07:27:08.589377"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 6 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
6
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-24T07:04:56.425673+00:00
First case
6
Generated
2026-02-24T07:04:56.425673+00:00
Attributed to
Case 6 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-24T07:27:08.589377
Generated by
ProEthica Case 6 Extraction