BER Case 17-3 Forensic Engineer Systemic Tract Defect Multi-Party Notification

O · Obligation Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/59#BER_Case_17-3_Forensic_Engineer_Systemic_Tract_Defect_Multi-Party_Notification
Properties
Instance of
SystemicTractDevelopmentDefectMulti-PartyNotificationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#SystemicTractDevelopmentDefectMulti-PartyNotificationObligation
Case context
Forensic Engineer was retained to evaluate a post-arson beam for possible re-use, determined it could be re-used, but discovered it was seriously undersized. Forensic Engineer included the systemic concern in the written report and the BER held that notification obligations extended to individual homeowners, the homeowners/community civic association, and local building officials — not merely the retaining client.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Obligated party
Forensic Engineer (BER Case 17-3)
Obligation statement
The forensic engineer in BER Case 17-3 was obligated to notify individual homeowners, the local homeowners or community civic association, and local building officials of the finding that the beam was seriously undersized and that the deficient design had likely been replicated in other tract homes of the same design.
Temporal scope
Upon completion of structural calculations confirming the beam was seriously undersized and upon forming the belief that the deficient design had been replicated in other tract homes
Source Evidence
Source text
Forensic Engineer was concerned that the beam appeared to be too light for the loads it carried, ran the appropriate structural calculations, and determined that the beam was seriously undersized.

Text references
Forensic Engineer includes the information in the written report, expressing the concern that the deficient design had been repeated in other tract homes in the development of the same design.
Forensic Engineer was concerned that the beam appeared to be too light for the loads it carried, ran the appropriate structural calculations, and determined that the beam was seriously undersized.
The BER held that Forensic Engineer had an obligation to notify individual homeowners, the local homeowners or community civic association, and local building officials of the findings.
TTL
@prefix case59: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/59#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case59:BER_Case_17-3_Forensic_Engineer_Systemic_Tract_Defect_Multi-Party_Notification a proeth:SystemicTractDevelopmentDefectMulti-PartyNotificationObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "BER Case 17-3 Forensic Engineer Systemic Tract Defect Multi-Party Notification" ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case59:BER_Case_17-3_Undersized_Beam_Discovery_During_Post-Arson_Evaluation ; proeth-core:prevailsOver case59:Faithful_Agent_Scope_Boundary_Engineer_A_Retaining_Wall_Engagement ; proeth:casecontext "Forensic Engineer was retained to evaluate a post-arson beam for possible re-use, determined it could be re-used, but discovered it was seriously undersized. Forensic Engineer included the systemic concern in the written report and the BER held that notification obligations extended to individual homeowners, the homeowners/community civic association, and local building officials — not merely the retaining client." ; proeth:compliancestatus "met" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.91" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case59:Third-Party_Affected_Party_Direct_Notification_Obligation_Invoked_in_BER_Case_17-3 ; proeth:discoveredincase "59" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T22:33:26.882360+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "59" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T22:33:26.882360+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Forensic Engineer (BER Case 17-3)" ; proeth:obligationclass "Systemic Tract Development Defect Multi-Party Notification Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "The forensic engineer in BER Case 17-3 was obligated to notify individual homeowners, the local homeowners or community civic association, and local building officials of the finding that the beam was seriously undersized and that the deficient design had likely been replicated in other tract homes of the same design." ; proeth:sourcetext "Forensic Engineer was concerned that the beam appeared to be too light for the loads it carried, ran the appropriate structural calculations, and determined that the beam was seriously undersized." ; proeth:temporalscope "Upon completion of structural calculations confirming the beam was seriously undersized and upon forming the belief that the deficient design had been replicated in other tract homes" ; proeth:textreferences "Forensic Engineer includes the information in the written report, expressing the concern that the deficient design had been repeated in other tract homes in the development of the same design.", "Forensic Engineer was concerned that the beam appeared to be too light for the loads it carried, ran the appropriate structural calculations, and determined that the beam was seriously undersized.", "The BER held that Forensic Engineer had an obligation to notify individual homeowners, the local homeowners or community civic association, and local building officials of the findings." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 59 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T22:42:18.053097"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 59 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 23:35
Discovered in case
59
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-25T22:33:26.882360+00:00
First case
59
Generated
2026-02-25T22:33:26.882360+00:00
Attributed to
Case 59 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T22:42:18.053097
Generated by
ProEthica Case 59 Extraction